FLAWED REVITALIZATION STATUTE STRIPPING HOME OWNER RIGHTS

An Opinion By Cheryl Boese

Published November 18, 2025

 

Corrective Remedy : FS 720.407  With respect to any Homeowner's Association that failed to commence an action by 10/01/2019 to revitalize the covenants they failed to timely preserve they shall be barred from revitalization.

 

With respect to any parcel that a Revitalization was not filed by an association as of October 1,2019 the grace period for Revitalization of extinguished covenants, articles & by laws not timely preserved shall be expired.

 

If an HOA ignored its legal duty to preserve covenants, yet is allowed to revitalize afterward, homeowners—particularly buyers who acquire properties with expired covenants—are left without remedies to uphold existing contracts. This discrepancy burdens property owners, can diminish property values and rights without recourse. Their property interests may be compromised by revitalization attempts that should have been barred by law.

 

The time for HOAs to seek revitalization has long since passed—this outdated loophole needs correction to safeguard homeowners property rights and prevent unwarranted legal expenses.
 
The current statute must be amended to clarify that the grace period for HOA revitalization has expired, requiring HOAs to act within a finite timeframe and preventing them from perpetually reviving expired covenants.

HOAs, that have failed to preserve per the law, yet repeatedly seek to revitalize, waste Florida Department of Commerce and homeowner resources.

 

In FS 712.12 homeowners were given a strict deadline of October 1, 2019 to protect their constitutional property rights from revitalization efforts by HOAs that failed to preserve covenants in a timely manner.

 

However, no such deadline was established for HOAs themselves, allowing them to repeatedly attempt revitalization years later, well after covenants expired.

 

This creates an imbalance, effectively stripping owners of their property rights by permitting HOAs to revive covenants long after the statute of limitations has run out.

 

The law clearly stipulated that preservation must occur before the 30-year extinguishment period. Yet, the flawed aspect of the current statute grants no opt-out mechanism for homeowners against HOAs revitalization attempts initiated after 10/01/2019 deadline. 

 

See the legal precedent set by Lyday vs. MVRIA

 

Therefore, HOAs should be barred by law from revitalization when they have failed to commence an action by 10/01/2019 to revitalize the covenants they failed to timely preserve.

Comment Box is loading comments...
NEWS HOME LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS