 |
|
|
|
An Opinion By Jan Bergemann Posted 8-8-2004
I sometimes just wonder where some boards are willing to waste the money of the owners. I may still understand the first arbitration hearing. But reading the SUMMARY FINAL ORDER it's like reading the writing on the wall.
But, not enough of that, in this case we see the Motion For Rehearing being filed. With the same devastating result for the board and their attorney. The arbitrator even quotes in his ruling that the attorney representing the board was attorney on record in one of the quoted cases used to rule against the association.
He is the same attorney, who, according to a newspaper report, argues that those rules supersede even constitutional rights.
And it seems the board of the TUDOR CAY CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. are not done yet. According to newspaper reports they are at it again, after changing the rules!
Hope there is in the end enough money left to cover the cost of regular maintenance. Isn't that what the dues of the unit-owners should be used for?
Or is this what's called "FIDUCIARY DUTY?"
Here are the players of this costly game according to public records:
|
| STORY | COURT DECISIONS | HOME | NEWS PAGE |