BAD
AWAKENING FOR NEIGHBORS OF JUPITER FLAGMAN
JUDGE
AWARDS BARRY SILVER $126,225 IN LEGAL FEES
|
An Opinion By Jan Bergemann
President, Cyber Citizens For Justice, Inc.
Published December 11, 2006
Another big financial blow for the board and
the members of the INDIAN CREEK PHASE III-B Homeowners' Association.
They had filed a lawsuit against their neighbor, George Andres, and tried
to foreclose on his home. His
"CRIME"? He flies "Ol'
Glory" from a flagpole on his private property!
The court battle for constitutional rights
lasted more than five years -- and it all started with an obviously ill-advised
lawsuit brought against Andres, a former Marine who dared to break non-existing
rules in the association's deed restrictions.
Not so -- decided Florida Courts and sided
with the Marine. Andres was only
able to fight for his rights after finding in Barry Silver an attorney willing
to defend his constitutional rights pro bono.
Without the pro bono help George Andres and his wife, Anna, most
likely would have lost their home.
Judge Edward Fine, in his ruling
that awarded Barry Silver the legal fees, acknowledged the risk of
taking on such lawsuit pro bono and used a 2.0 multiplier to calculate
the actual award!
We always hear from attorneys and over-eager
board members that owners, being sued by their associations, had agreed to the
restrictions by signing a contract before buying the home.
Can such a contract take away the CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHTS OF A HOMEOWNER? Definitely
not -- according to the SUPERIOR
COURT OF NEW JERSEY !
And if these people would look a little
closer and not just parrot the fairy tales of the attorneys that have a
financial interest in keeping this fairy tale alive, they would realize that
most legal battles are fought over interpretations of these restrictions (see
Jupiter Flag case) or invalid amendment or rules made up by boards as they
go along -- often on advice of these attorneys!
Board members have to realize that they risk
the money of the owners, whose interests they are supposed to represent, for
lawsuits that really don't serve anybody's interest.
These pointless lawsuits only fill the wallets of these specialized
attorneys!
Board members should think again before
risking the association’s money in a legal battle that -- even if victorious
in the end -- may cost a neighbor his home and leave the association with a big
hole in the bank account!
Always consider what even a successful
outcome will achieve for your community!
- Will it improve the property values?
Most likely not!
- Will it improve life in your community?
Most likely not!
- Will it make your community more neighborly?
Most likely not!
- Will you see more happy neighbors?
Most likely not!
- Will it improve the income of the specialized attorney?
Definitely, YES!
Why file an expensive lawsuit that can easily
cost more than $100,000? For
principle? Or maybe because your
attorney told you that you would lose the power to enforce the rules if you
don't file this lawsuit?
Please don't be so gullible -- and always
remember that this attorney might only have one interest in mind: HIS WALLET!
Otherwise, you may end up like the board
members of the INDIAN CREEK PHASE III-B Homeowners' Association, who have to
explain to their neighbors why they have to pay a large special assessment to
cover the legal fees.
Believe
me, that's not an easy task! It's
easier to approach the neighbor before starting litigation.
Try to find a feasible solution BEFORE the association attorney mails the
first nasty letter! It will save
your association’s money and all of the aggravation of a lawsuit.
This
award of legal fees should as well send a warning to the homeowners who live in
a community where the board is harassing someone for perceived violations of the
rules. The
homeowners definitely should get involved, and demand that the board act
more responsibly.
Otherwise, they could become subject to a major
assessment.
The
moral of the story: Neighbors should not be apathetic, or it could
hurt not only the target of the board's aggression, but everyone else in
the community as well.
Being
nice and neighborly is often more successful than a risky lawsuit!
READ
ALL ARTICLES
Click here to see copy of the Court Ruling!
|