THE HEARING

HB 657: Favorable with CS by Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee

An Opinion By Jan Bergemann

CCFJ, Inc., Preseident

Published February 7, 2026

WATCH VIDEO

HB 657 – the HOA Bill that would solve problems with the Kaufman language, would create easier enforcement of community association laws and the possibility of a super-majority of owners terminating their HOA. It’s definitely a very owner-friendly bill sponsored by Representative Juan Carlos Porras, and co-sponsored by many other House Representatives.

Lots of homeowners testified in front of the committee and told the committee members about their serious problems – more or less the same kind of stories homeowners are telling legislators since twenty-four (24) years. It seems that only the names of associations, attorneys and community association managers are changing.

And it was very interesting to hear that quite a few of the committee members spoke out in favor of the bill, stating that homeowners’ association problems are among the biggest complaints they hear from their constituents.

Actually we only heard two people speaking out opposing the bill – and guess what: Both are attorneys! In all reality they were opposing the bill obviously afraid that enacting provisions of the bill would lower their income – or that of their colleagues. Since there is in the moment no government enforcement of the HOA ACT (FS 720), any problem in these communities can only be solved by litigation.

REPRESENTATIVE

JUAN CARLOS PORRAS

District: 119 -- (Miami -- R)


And litigation really means: It makes attorneys rich and homeowners poor, because in the end all owners pay -- no matter who wins or loses. And it really makes no sense that simple issues, like record inspections or elections and recall, can create legal bills in amounts of tens of thousands of dollars.

 

Actually we only heard two people speaking out opposing the bill – and guess what: Both are attorneys! In all reality they were opposing the bill obviously afraid that enacting provisions of the bill would lower their income – or that of their colleagues. Since there is in the moment no government enforcement of the HOA ACT (FS 720), any problem in these communities can only be solved by litigation.

 

I found especially the arguments we heard from Representative Gottlieb, one of the committee members, pretty offensive. Considering the fact that he represents part of Broward County – a county with most likely the most community association problems here in Florida – it sounded to me like he was not representing the interests of his constituents, but more so the interests of his profession.

This is a copy of the e-mail I sent to Representative Gottlieb after HB 657 was favorably voted out of committee with a vote of 14-1. The one NAY vote came from Representative Gottlieb – and that says it all.

Jan Bergemann
1156 Tall Oaks Rd
DeLand, FL 32720
(386)740-1503

02/03/26 4:12 PM

To the Honorable Michael "Mike" Gottlieb ;

HB 657
You should be ashamed voting NAY on this owner-friendly bill. The county you represent has by far the most complaints from homeowners. But typical attorney: Are you defending the many folks who are caught with their hands in the HOA cookie jar?

REPRESENTATIVE

MICHAEL "MIKE" GOTTLIEB

District: 102 (Broward County -- D)

Occupation:  Criminal Defense Attorney


If you click “WATCH VIDEO” you can listen to the complete testimony and discussion regarding HB 657. There are some pretty interesting discussions to be heard!

 

The next stop of the bill will be at the HOUSE BUDGET COMMITTEE.


NEWS PAGE HOME

LEGISLATIVE SESSION 2026