|
Article
Courtesy of The Realtor
By Tristan Navera
Published November 6, 2026
Florida voters are projected to approve a measure that
would reform the state's property tax system, increasing the homestead
property tax exemption and reducing the tax bill for some households.
|
Amendment 3,
championed by outgoing Gov. Ron DeSantis, aims to increase
the homestead property tax exemption from $50,000 to
$150,000 in 2027 and to $250,000 in 2028. DeSantis, a
Republican, estimated the latter threshold would eliminate
property tax for 60% of Florida homeowners.
At 9:45 p.m. ET, with 98% of votes reported, The Associated
Press reported the measure had 62% of votes in favor and 38%
opposed. The measure, which would go into effect in 2027,
needs 60% voter approval to pass.
"Big win on Amendment 3 for Florida homeowners," DeSantis
posted on X.
The exemption would apply only to Floridians who established
residency prior to December 2026. New residents would need
to wait five years before being eligible for the exemptions.
The measure would also lower the annual cap on assessment
increases for nonhomestead properties to 5%, down from the
current 10%. |
|
Ron DeSantis, the term-limited governor of Florida,
backed the property tax reform
|
Byron Donalds, a GOP representative projected to win the
election to replace the term-limited DeSantis, supported the measure. His
opponent, Democrat David Jolly, did not. AP projects that Donalds will win
the governor's race.
"In a state where homeowners insurance premiums are growing quickly due to
climate concerns, which in turn drives HOA dues higher as well, any relief
from the annual carrying costs of owning a home in Florida is welcome," says
Realtor.com senior economist Joel Berner.
Berner notes that the median listing price in Florida fell 3.5% year over
year in September and the number of homes for sale fell 9.6% from last year.
"Buyers and sellers are opting out of participation in the market as
affordability constraints keep deals from going the distance at prices both
parties can agree upon," the economist says.
On Tuesday night, Florida Realtors® President Chuck Bonfiglio Jr. said the
result proved "Florida homeowners chose property tax relief."
"At a time when families are paying more for housing, insurance, groceries
and everyday necessities, voters seized the opportunity to keep more of
their own hard-earned money, taking a meaningful step toward making Florida
a more affordable place to buy, own and keep a home," he said in a statement
to Realtor.com.
"Florida Realtors was proud to stand with homeowners in supporting Amendment
3. We have worked with state and local leaders for decades to reduce
barriers to homeownership, and we look forward to building on that
partnership as Florida puts this relief into place responsibly, without
compromising the essential services our communities depend on.”
Change in property taxes
The MidFlorida Credit Union estimated in 2024 that the average homeowner in
the state pays around $2,338 a year in property taxes. In more expensive
areas like Miami-Dade County and Palm Beach County, taxes can be
significantly higher.
DeSantis argued that the measure would provide much needed financial relief
for homeowners. Opponents argued the reduction in property tax revenue would
have a deleterious effect on local governments.
Florida does not have an individual income tax or estate taxes, creating a
limited pool of money for local governments to fund with. State economists
had argued that the measure would wipe out nearly a quarter of all funding
for local governments and deprive schools of billions in local revenue,
hitting smaller counties especially hard.
In August, a circuit court judge ruled that the bill's original title, "Save
Our Homes From Excessive Property Taxes," was "clearly and conclusively
defective" and "more akin to a political slogan" than a neutral statement.
The judge also dinged the bill for including "factually inaccurate" language
and ordered that ballot language be amended prior to the midterm election.
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier then changed the name of the
proposed amendment to the "Homestead Tax Exemptions, Property Assessments,
and Spending Restrictions Amendment" and revised the language that
ultimately appeared on the ballot.
Amendment 3's impact
A model by the National Association of Realtors® found cutting property
taxes by $200 a month lowered the income needed to afford the median-priced
Florida home from about $133,800 to $125,200—a move that would put roughly
242,000 additional households above the affordability threshold.
NAR estimates that about 93,500 additional households under 45—including
roughly 40,000 younger renters—could afford a starter home.
Florida homeowners might be thinking of more immediate relief, though. The
state has some of the highest homeowners association fees in the country. It
is also a center of the nation's property insurance crisis.
Florida Realtors' political action committee put $18 million into a "Vote
Yes on 3" campaign, according to WPTV, significantly outraising its
opponents. In a previously published op-ed to Realtor.com, Bonfiglio denied
that the measure necessarily meant cuts to public services.
“Voting yes on Amendment 3 is Step 1, where Floridians decide that
homeowners deserve this relief. But we can't forget about Step 2:
implementation, where communities will work through how to deliver that
relief while keeping public safety and core services first,” he wrote.
Meanwhile, opponents argue that such a measure would increase costs for
public services, and that the measure privileges the desires of homeowners
over non-homeowning citizens. An analysis published by the Florida Housing
Coalition found that an estimated $1.61 billion in property taxes could be
shifted to rental homes in 2028, growing to $2.19 billion by 2031.
"There's a small segment of homeowners that will benefit from this," Mike
Weinstein, Jacksonville's chief administrative officer and a former state
legislator, told NPR. "But the majority of people—renters, business owners,
everyone else, and even many homeowners—won't see any benefit from this
amendment at all."
|