Judge tosses challenge to part of insurance law |
Article Courtesy of News4Jax
By Jim Saunders
Published
September 5, 2022
TALLAHASSEE – A Leon County circuit judge has
rejected a challenge by contractors to part of a new property-insurance
law that restricted attorney fees in insurance disputes.
Judge J. Lee Marsh issued an order Monday dismissing a constitutional
challenge filed in May by the Restoration Association of Florida and Air
Quality Assessors, LLC, an Orlando firm that does work such as mold
testing and leak detection.
The challenge targeted part of a law passed during a May special
legislative session that Gov. Ron DeSantis called to address massive
problems in Florida’s property-insurance market. The lawsuit named as
defendants Melanie Griffin, secretary of the Florida Department of
Business and Professional Regulation, and Donald Shaw, executive
director of the state Construction Industry Licensing Board, because
they have disciplinary and regulatory authority over contractors.
Marsh’s order did not directly address the constitutionality of the law
but dismissed the case because he said Griffin and Shaw were not “proper
defendants,” in part because they were not in charge of enforcing the
law.
The insurance industry has long blamed litigation and attorney fees for
driving up costs. The new law took a series of steps to try to address
those issues, but the challenge focused on part of the measure that
deals with what is known as “assignment of benefits.”
In assignment of benefits, homeowners sign over their insurance claims
to contractors, who then seek payment from insurance companies — often
spurring lawsuits about claims and payments.
Contractors in the past have been able to recover their attorney fees
from insurers if they were successful in the lawsuits, a concept known
as “prevailing party fees.” But the new law (SB 2-D) stripped
contractors of being able to recover prevailing-party fees when they are
assigned benefits.
Homeowners can still recover prevailing-party fees if they file lawsuits
directly against insurers, but the contractors cannot. The lawsuit
alleged that the change violates equal-protection and due-process rights
and denies contractors access to courts.
“When the insurer delays, underpays or does not pay a claim at all,
contractors are forced to commence an action against the insurer to
recover the full amount due for the work performed,” attorneys for the
Restoration Association of Florida and Air Quality Assessors wrote in an
Aug. 4 response to the state’s motion to dismiss the case. “Without the
corresponding right to recover attorneys’ fees, SB 2-D makes it
economically unfeasible for the contractor to pursue its lawful rights
and remedies in court and thus effectively voids the AOB (assignment of
benefits), leaving the assignee (the contractor) holding the bag.”
But in seeking dismissal, the state’s attorneys focused on issues such
as whether Griffin and Shaw were proper defendants. In the July 13
motion to dismiss, for example, the attorneys wrote that the law “does
not charge the secretary or the executive director with enforcing its
provisions” and does not implicate their “specific responsibilities.”
“In other words, do the secretary or executive director have specific
responsibilities relating to property insurance or awarding attorney’s
fees in insurance litigation? They clearly do not,” the state’s
attorneys wrote.
As an indication of the interest in the lawsuit, the state-backed
Citizens Property Insurance Corp., Security First Insurance Co., Tower
Hill Signature Insurance Co. and US Coastal Property & Casualty
Insurance Co. formally intervened to help defend the law.
The Restoration Association of Florida and Florida Premier Roofing LLC
also have a challenge pending in Leon County circuit court to another
law (SB 4-D) passed during the special session.
Florida’s property-insurance market has been in upheaval as insurers
have dropped customers and sought huge rate increases because of
financial losses. Five property insurers have been declared insolvent
since February, and policies have poured into Citizens, which was
created by the state as an insurer of last resort.
|