Beachgoers lined up along the Gulf of Mexico near Perdido Beach Access #2, on Monday. Many come from out-of-state, including one man who sat in the sand close to the water in front of La Riva condominium complex in an area that, until last year, had been private property.
La Riva’s condo association is one of six associations on Perdido Key involved in a lawsuit against Escambia County that is asking the court to determine if a 75-foot public easement on the beach in front of their property is, in fact, valid.
|
Perdido Key beach property owners sue Escambia County over public easement. |
Commissioner Jeff
Bergosh, who represents Perdido Key, is determined to fight
to keep the Gulf front easement open to the public. He
believes private and public beachgoers can co-exist
peacefully. He also said the private property owners are
benefitting from the recent addition of lifeguards on
Perdido Key and other amenities as a result of public tax
dollars.
“I feel bad for them (condo owners),” said Bergosh. “They
were duped. They were sold a bill of goods that they had
exclusive private beach all the way to the sand. That’s not
my fault. Blame that on whomever it was that sold them the
property and duped them. I’m going to fight for the people.
I'm going to keep that beach open, even if I have to go to
the Supreme Court, as long as I'm in this office.”
The lawsuit comes as no surprise to longtime residents and
property owners on Perdido Key, where public access to the
beach remains an important issue. The condo owners bought
their units with the expectation that it was a private
beach, while some Escambia County residents believe public
beach is limited.
“We're growing,” said Charles Krupnick, director of the
Perdido Key Association board. “Beach access #4 was open
just a a year or so ago, and the issue of public access to
Perdido Key beaches is certainly one of importance to the
area, but so is the respect of private property rights and
exactly how the discovery or the rediscovery of that
particular easement, how that's going to affect the property
owners in that mile or so of land. We'll just have to see
how it works out in court.”