Some South Florida
condo owners are in deep trouble.
Three years after the deadly collapse of the Champlain
Towers South in Surfside, Fla., regulations meant to prevent
another building disaster are coming into effect — and look
set to cost condo owners, especially those living in aging
buildings.
|
Castle Beach Club. |
Before Champlain’s collapse, which killed
98 people, owners typically paid the minimum amount for
maintenance, and most condos in Florida went mostly
unchecked. Only Miami-Dade and Broward counties had
recertification requirements beginning at the 40-year mark.
But even those measures were lax and prone to delays as
evidenced by the Champlain building. For years, its
homeowners association had pushed off repairs, and it was
finally about to start renovations for its 40-year
recertification when tragedy struck.
Now the “benchmark put in place by the state is almost like
the car manufacturer telling you that you need an oil change
every 5,000 miles,” said Greg Main-Baillie, a 20-year
veteran at Colliers, who oversees construction projects.
The new regulations not only require owners to prepare for
repairs that will come due in the next decade, they’re also
forcing homeowners to make up for lost time. Say a
50-year-old building has a roof that had an estimated useful
life of 20 years. It never leaked, so the association never
fixed it. Come Jan. 1, the roof that’s 30 years past useful
life will have to be replaced imminently — not over the
coming decade.
Take the Palm Bay Yacht Club condo in Miami Shores. Last
year, homeowners were quoted $46 million in repairs, which
comes to $175,000 per unit on average. While the report was
written a few months before the legislature passed the new
regulations, the price tag is an indication of what’s to
come for some aging buildings that haven’t been properly
maintained in years, if not decades, experts say.
“All deferred maintenance does is make anything that should
have been taken care of now more expensive to do in the
future,” said Christopher Alker, resident architect and
senior vice president of building operations at Akam, which
helps condo associations with construction projects.
With these assessments looming, owners will face a tough
choice: pay up or sell. But offloading a condo is no easy
task. The South Florida market, after red-hot growth during
the pandemic, has cooled. The median sale price of a Miami
condo fell by 2.5 percent in 2023, according to data from
Redfin. Not everyone wants to dispose of their home, either.
Many owners are on fixed incomes. Some have also lived in
their condo for years, or even decades, and have little
appetite to move.
For would-be buyers, the assessment represents an additional
liability. Demand for condos has ebbed as some Northerners
who decamped to Florida during the pandemic have returned to
their old hometowns. At the same time, high interest rates
and expensive home insurance are also deterring buyers.
While Florida’s home insurance market has moderated since
state lawmakers passed new regulations in 2022, the Sunshine
State still has some of the nation’s most expensive rates,
averaging $1,968 a year, according to March 2024 data from
Quadrant Information Services.
For sellers of aging condos, the last remaining set of
viable buyers then could include developers, for whom these
buildings present a great opportunity. If the conditions are
right, a developer can buy out all the owners in an aging
condo building, demolish the existing structures, and build
new, often luxury condos or hotels on prime real estate.
But such buyouts are famously not not easy. “There’s a lot
of moving parts,” said Julian Zuniga, a Colliers broker who
represents associations. “So they really only work when
there’s a meeting of the minds between what a developer is
willing to pay and what the owners think is enough of a
premium for them to sell.”
Though regulations vary from building to building,
developers must acquire at least 80 percent of units to gain
control of the homeowners association and shutter the entity
in what’s known as a condo termination. The threshold
commonly rises to 95 percent, making a bulk buy a tall ask
for buildings that contain hundreds of units.
Plus, holdouts often sue, as they did at the Biscayne 21
condo building. After years of negotiations in 2022, Two
Roads Development announced that it closed on the bulk
purchase of the waterfront property for $150 million. The
developer later unveiled plans to build a 55-story,
Edition-branded complex on the site with prices starting at
$1.7 million. But 10 owners refused to sell and sued. Just
this month, a state appeals court in Florida blocked Two
Roads’ buyout, granting the holdout owners a temporary
injunction.
The ruling is not only throwing cold water on Two Roads’
plans, but it could also upend other terminations that are
in the works. Two Roads Development has vowed to take the
case to Florida’s Supreme Court. (Hernandez represents Two
Roads Development in the case.)
Not every condo is a prime target for takeover. Because of
the challenges associated with terminations, developers will
typically target only properties along the water, which can
then attract the highest condo prices.
Even when they offer owners lots of money, developers have
struggled. A year ago, Terra, a prominent Miami developer,
offered an eye-watering $500 million to buy out the 570-unit
Castle Beach Club in Miami Beach. But contracts for the
majority of owners expired in January, The Real Deal
reported. While talks remain ongoing, and the developer
hopes to close the deal by the end of the year, another
joint venture, led by Related Group, Miami’s largest condo
developer, pulled out after encountering resistance, despite
making the same offer. (Zuniga represents the Castle Beach
Club association.)
Another wrinkle for condo owners is the so-called “50
percent rule.” Florida statutes stipulate that if an owner
spends more than 50 percent of a building or a unit’s
appraised value to upgrade it, the owner must bring the
entire property up to current code standards. In practice,
the rule has required owners to completely redevelop their
properties and could prime more buildings toward bulk sales.
Amid a tight lending market, some developers are waiting on
the sidelines, hoping that, as the assessments come in, more
owners will become amenable to selling.
The coming year will test many buildings. “It’s time to pay
the piper!” Alker said.