Article
Courtesy of Miami Herald
By CARLI
TEPROFF
Published October 2, 2006
Four out of six buildings in the La Playa de
Varadero III complex must be demolished, the Miami-Dade County unsafe
structure board ruled Sept. 20.
The board also gave the condominium association of
the Sunny Isles Beach complex 180 days to apply for permits to repair one
building and the gazebo.
Sunny Isles Beach City Attorney Hans Ottinot said
the ruling only helps the city to meet its goal of making the city safer.
''We have a public duty to ensure that unsafe
structures no longer exist in the city,'' he said.
The aging complex came under scrutiny more than a
year ago when it underwent its 40-year inspection by the city.
At the time, the city's building official, Clay
Parker, ruled the catwalks and other areas of the condo hotel had
structural damage.
When hurricanes Katrina and Wilma blew through, the
damage only worsened.
In October, Parker condemned the building and it has
since been vacant.
Meanwhile, an internal battle has ensued between
about 40 homeowners and the board, which is controlled by LPLA Partners
LP, an affiliate of developer Jules Trump. Trump built neighboring
Acqualina and other luxury complexes like Williams Island. Jules Trump is
not related to Donald Trump, who is also building in Sunny Isles Beach.
The board of the La Playa association wants to tear
the building down, citing cost, but some residents want the complex
repaired.
Rebecca Henderson, the lawyer representing the
residents who want the building repaired, said she was disappointed the
board ruled that four of the buildings had to be demolished.
She argues Jules Trump won't allow the repairs
because he wants to build something else.
''We might appeal,'' she said. ``We don't believe
the buildings have enough damage to warrant demolition.''
In July, the city was forced to put a demolition
permit on hold until the two parties reached an agreement in court.
Gary Phillips, the lawyer representing LPLA, said
the next step is to get estimates on how much it will cost to repair the
building.
''For us it has always been a safety issue,'' he
said.
He said initial estimates showed it was way too much
to repair the existing buildings and more prudent to knock them down.
Resident Alex Fusco, who owns a unit, said he
believes it is in everyone's best interest if the buildings are torn down.
''There are some holdouts who won't sell because
they want to get as much money out of the developer as they possibly
can,'' he said. ``They have tried every stall tactic possible.''
Last year LPLA bought several units for about
$140,000.
The buildings were never used as a primary
residences, only weekend homes and rentals.
Noelia Delgado, one of the unit owners who does not
want the building demolished, said the ruling was favorable.
|