TABLE 8: CLARIFY RULES FOR RECORD REQUESTS AND ENFORCE THOSE RULES
KEY FINDINGS:   1   Overall 95.7% of respondents want the rules for requests to see HOA records clarified and enforced.
2   Boldfaced values in the rows of column YESes and Noes differ significantly from the overall average as they are at least 3 standard away from that value.  The disparities are particularly strong 
            within all respondent traits except gender.
3   All but one of the Non-Owner Interest groups' percent YES and NO responses are statistically significantly different from the corresponding ones of Owners and Overall figures.  Attorneys and
             Other were significantly more in favor of this recommendation than respondents overall or Owners.  Conversely, Board Members and C.A.M.s were significantly less in favor.
4   Some percentage YES and NO responses in the Gender, CCFJ Membership, Region and Additional Remarks Made sections differ significantly from the Overall figures and one another.
5   The YES and NO percentage responses of CCFJ members differ significantly from one another as well as from those Overall.
6   The respondents' traits of Interest and CCFJ memberships had potentially causal influences on their responses to this question.
* * * * * * * * * * * *  * * * * * * * *  INTEREST * * * * * * * *   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  REGION [8]  * * * * * * * * * * ADDITIONAL REMARKS  MADE * * 
BOARD * * * GENDER [5] * * * CFJ MEMBER [7] WEST EAST PRIORITY COMMENT
OVERALL OWNER MEMBER [1] LAWYER C.A.M. [2] OTHER [3] N.A. [4] MALE FEMALE D.K. [6] YES NO NORTH CENTRAL COAST COAST SOUTH ONLY ONLY BOTH NEITHER
OVERALL TOTALS 1033 740 130 7 13 8 135 584 380 60 196 837 35 202 156 137 503   176 131 418 308
% WITHIN CATEGORY 100.0% 71.6% 12.6% 0.7% 1.3% 0.8% 13.1%   56.5% 36.8% 5.8% 19.0% 81.0% 3.4% 19.6% 15.1% 13.3% 48.7%   17.0% 12.7% 40.5% 29.8%
ADJUSTED # [9] 1026 737 131 7 11 8 132 584 380 62 190 836 34 201 155 135 501 175 131 418 302
# OF YESes 982 714 118 7 10 8 125 559 364 59 189 793 34 192 152 131 473 172 121 401 288
# OF NOs 44 23 13 0 1 0 7 25 16 3   1 43 0 9 3 4 28 3 10 17 14
COLUMN % YES [10] 95.7% 96.9% 90.1% 100.0% 90.9% 100.0% 94.7% 95.7% 95.8% 95.2% 99.5% 94.9% 100.0% 95.5% 98.1% 97.0% 94.4% 98.3% 92.4% 95.9% 95.4%
t-Test on % YESes [11] 1.8 -8.9 6.8 -7.6 6.8 -1.6 0.0 0.1 -0.9 5.9 -1.4 6.8 -0.3 3.7 2.1 -2.1 4.1 -5.3 0.3 -0.5
COLUMN % NO [10] 4.3% 3.1% 9.9% 0.0% 9.1% 0.0% 5.3% 4.3% 4.2% 4.8% 0.5% 5.1% 0.0% 4.5% 1.9% 3.0% 5.6% 1.7% 7.6% 4.1% 4.6%
t-Test on % NOes [11] -1.8 8.9 -6.8 7.6 -6.8 1.6 0.0 -0.1 0.9 -5.9 1.4 -6.8 0.3 -3.7 -2.1 2.1 -4.1 5.3 -0.3 0.5
1 STD. DEVIATION [12] 0.6%
% YESes Row [10] 100.0% 72.7% 12.0% 0.7% 1.0% 0.8% 12.7% 56.9% 37.1% 6.0% 19.2% 80.8% 3.5% 19.6% 15.5% 13.3% 48.2% 17.5% 12.3% 40.8% 29.3%
% NOs Row [10] 100.0% 52.3% 29.5% 0.0% 2.3% 0.0% 15.9% 56.8% 36.4% 6.8% 2.3% 97.7% 0.0% 20.5% 6.8% 9.1% 63.6% 6.8% 22.7% 38.6% 31.8%
Calculated Chi-Squared Value [13]: 0.0016 0.9889 "0.0046"  0.0969 0.9324
Implication of Chi-Squared Test RELATIONSHIP FOUND INDEPENDENT RELATIONSHIP LIKELY INDEPENDENT INDEPENDENT
2 ROWS X 3 COLUMNS 2 ROWS X 2 COLUMNS CELL < 5 2 ROWS X 3 COLUMNS
© 2008 Cyber Citizens for Justice, Inc.   Deland, FL