TABLE 6: BAR ALL KINDS OF FINANCIAL COMPENSATION FOR DIRECTORS EXCEPT FOR REPAYMENT OF PRE-AUTHORIZED AND DOCUMENTED OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENSES
KEY FINDINGS:	1	Overall 92.1% of respondents were in favor of enforcing the bar against all kinds of financial compensation for HOA directors
	2	Boldfaced values in the row of column YESes differ significantly from the overall average as they are at least 3 standard deviations away from that value.  The disparity between Owners' views and
		other Interest groups is pronounced.
	3	Most of the percentage YES and NO responses of Non-owner Interest groups are statistically significantly different from the corresponding ones of Owners and Overall figures.
		So too are the responses by women, respondents in the Northern Region, and those offering a Comment
	4	Percentage responses of the Members and Non-members of CCFJ essentially agreed with one another and the Overall figures.
	5	The YES and NO percentage responses of CCFJ members did not differ significantly from both those Overall and of Non-members.
	6	None of the five respondents' traits had a potentially causal influence on their responses to this question.
				* * * * * * * * * * * *	* * * * * * * * *  INTEREST  * * * * * * * * * * * * *			* * * * * * * * *										* * * * * * *  REGION [8]  * * * * * * *						* * ADDITIONAL REMARKS  MADE * *
					BOARD						* * * GENDER [5] * * *				CCFJ MEMBER [7]					WEST	EAST			PRIORITY	COMMENT
		OVERALL		OWNER	MEMBER [1]	LAWYER	C.A.M. [2]	OTHER [3]	N.A. [4]		MALE	FEMALE	D.K. [6]		YES	NO		NORTH	CENTRAL	COAST	COAST	SOUTH		ONLY	ONLY	BOTH	NEITHER
OVERALL TOTALS		1033		740	130	7	13	8	135		584	389	60		196	837		35	202	156	137	503		176	131	418	308
% WITHIN CATEGORY		100.0%		71.6%	12.6%	0.7%	1.3%	0.8%	13.1%		56.5%	37.7%	5.8%		19.0%	81.0%		3.4%	19.6%	15.1%	13.3%	48.7%		17.0%	12.7%	40.5%	29.8%
ADJUSTED # [9]		1029		738	130	7	12	8	134		590	384	55		192	837		34	201	156	136	502		176	130	416	308
# OF YESes		948		691	114	6	11	7	119		534	364	50		179	769		34	186	145	125	458		161	115	385	288
# OF NOs		81		47	16	1	1	1	15		56	20	5		13	68		0	15	11	11	44		15	15	31	20
COLUMN % YES [10]		92.1%		93.6%	87.7%	85.7%	91.7%	87.5%	88.8%		90.5%	94.8%	90.9%		93.2%	91.9%		100.0%	92.5%	92.9%	91.9%	91.2%		91.5%	88.5%	92.5%	93.5%
t-Test on % YESes [11]				1.8	-5.3	-7.6	-0.5	-5.5	-4.0		-1.9	3.2	-1.4		1.3	-0.3		9.4	0.5	1.0	-0.3	-1.1		-0.8	-4.4	0.5	1.6
COLUMN % NO [10]		7.9%		6.4%	12.3%	14.3%	8.3%	12.5%	11.2%		9.5%	5.2%	9.1%		6.8%	8.1%		0.0%	7.5%	7.1%	8.1%	8.8%		8.5%	11.5%	7.5%	6.5%
t-Test on % NOes [11]				-1.8	5.3	7.6	0.5	5.5	4.0		1.9	-3.2	1.4		-1.3	0.3		-9.4	-0.5	-1.0	0.3	1.1		0.8	4.4	-0.5	-1.6
1 STD. DEVIATION [12]		0.8%
% YESes Row [10]		100.0%		72.9%	12.0%	0.6%	1.2%	0.7%	12.6%		56.3%	38.4%	5.3%		18.9%	81.1%		3.6%	19.6%	15.3%	13.2%	48.3%		17.0%	12.1%	40.6%	30.4%
% NOs Row [10]		100.0%		58.0%	19.8%	1.2%	1.2%	1.2%	18.5%		69.1%	24.7%	6.2%		16.0%	84.0%		0.0%	18.5%	13.6%	13.6%	54.3%		18.5%	18.5%	38.3%	24.7%
Calculated Chi-Squared Value [13]:				0.0161							0.0487				0.5300			0.6628						0.3308
Implication of Chi-Squared Test				INDEPENDENT							INDEPENDENT				INDEPENDENT			INDEPENDENT						INDEPENDENT
				2 ROWS X 3 COLUMNS														2 ROWS X 4 COLUMNS
													© 2008 Cyber Citizens for Justice, Inc.   Deland, FL