TABLE 4: HOLD DIRECTORS PERSONALLY ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR ACTS AND BAR FELONS FROM SERVING AS DIRECTORS PLUS OTHER RESTRICTIONS
KEY FINDINGS:   1    Overall 96.9% of respondents want directors held personally liable for their acts, felons barred from board service, and other restrictions
2    Boldfaced values in the rows of column YESes and Nos differ significantly from the overall average as they are at least 3 standard deviations away from that value. 
3    The percentage YES and NO responses of all but one of the non-owner interest groups are statistically significantly different from the corresponding ones of Owners and Overall in that they are 
             much less favorably inclined to have directors held personally responsible for their acts.    
4     Some percentage YES and NO responses in the Gender, Region and Additional Remarks Made sections differ significantly from the Overall figures.   
5     The YES and NO percentage responses of CCFJ members differed significantly from both those Overall and of Non-members.  Non-members responses, however, were not statistically 
             significantly different from the Overall values.
6    There's a potentially causal relationship between respondents' Interest and their response to this question.
* * * * * * * * * * * *  * * * * * * * *  INTEREST * * * * * * * *   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  REGION [8]  * * * * * * * * * ADDITIONAL REMARKS  MADE * * 
BOARD  * * * GENDER [5] * * *  CCFJ MEMBER [7] WEST EAST PRIORITY COMMENT
OVERALL OWNER MEMBER [1] LAWYER C.A.M. [2] OTHER [3] N.A. [4] MALE FEMALE D.K. [6] YES NO NORTH CENTRAL COAST COAST SOUTH ONLY ONLY BOTH NEITHER
OVERALL TOTALS 1033 740 130 7 13 8 135 583 389 60 196 837 35 202 156 137 503   176 131 418 308
% WITHIN CATEGORY 100.0% 71.6% 12.6% 0.7% 1.3% 0.8% 13.1%   56.4% 37.7% 5.8% 19.0% 81.0% 3.4% 19.6% 15.1% 13.3% 48.7%   17.0% 12.7% 40.5% 29.8%
ADJUSTED # [9] 1024 733 130 7 12 8 134 583 385 56 191 833 34 202 155 135 498 174 131 414 305
# OF YESes 992 718 121 5 11 7 130 566 373 53 189 803 34 197 151 131 479 170 125 402 295
# OF NOs 32 15 9 2 1 1 4 17 12 3 2 30 0 5 4 4 19 4 6 12 10
COLUMN % YES [10] 96.9% 98.0% 93.1% 71.4% 91.7% 87.5% 97.0% 97.1% 96.9% 94.6% 99.0% 96.4% 100.0% 97.5% 97.4% 97.0% 96.2% 97.7% 95.4% 97.1% 96.7%
t-Test on % YESes [11] 2.0 -7.0 -47.0 -9.6 -17.3 0.3 0.4 0.0 -4.1 3.8 -0.9 5.8 1.2 1.0 0.3 -1.3 1.5 -2.7 0.4 -0.3
COLUMN % NO [10] 3.1% 2.0% 6.9% 28.6% 8.3% 12.5% 3.0% 2.9% 3.1% 5.4% 1.0% 3.6% 0.0% 2.5% 2.6% 3.0% 3.8% 2.3% 4.6% 2.9% 3.3%
t-Test on % NOes [11] -2.0 7.0 47.0 9.6 17.3 -0.3 -0.4 0.0 4.1 -3.8 0.9 -5.8 -1.2 -1.0 -0.3 1.3 -1.5 2.7 -0.4 0.3
1 STD. DEVIATION [12] 0.5%
% YESes Row [10] 100.0% 72.4% 12.2% 0.5% 1.1% 0.7% 13.1% 57.1% 37.6% 5.3% 19.1% 80.9% 3.4% 19.9% 15.2% 13.2% 48.3% 17.1% 12.6% 40.5% 29.7%
% NOs Row [10] 100.0% 46.9% 28.1% 6.3% 3.1% 3.1% 12.5% 53.1% 37.5% 9.4% 6.3% 93.8% 0.0% 15.6% 12.5% 12.5% 59.4% 12.5% 18.8% 37.5% 31.3%
Calculated Chi-Squared Value [13]: 0.0064 0.6584 "0.0673" 0.4270 0.7050
Implication of Chi-Squared Test RELATIONSHIP FOUND INDEPENDENT INDEPENDENT INDEPENDENT INDEPENDENT
2 ROWS x 3 COLUMNS 2 ROWS x 2 COLUMNS CELL < 5 2 ROWS x 3 COLUMNS
© 2008 Cyber Citizens for Justice, Inc.   Deland, FL