TABLE 14: REVITALIZATION CONTROL AND ENFORCEMENT TO REQUIRE WRITTEN NOTICE AND WRITTEN APPROVAL BY AT LEAST 75% OF DEEDED OWNERS
Comments:   1   Overall 91.1% of respondents wanted HOA revitalization controlled and enforced.
2    Boldfaced values in the rows of column YESes and Noes differ significantly from the overall average as they are at least 3 standard deviations away from that value.  The disparities are notable 
             within the respondent traits of Interest, Region and Additional Remarks Made.
3   Percentage YES and NO responses of some Non-owner Interest groups, notably Board Members, Lawyers andCAMs are statistically significantly different from the corresponding ones of Owners or Overall.  
             Lawyers' strong support for this reform is unusal but has to be offset against the small number of lawyers responding.
4   Some percentage YES and NO responses in the Gender, Region and Additional Remarks Made sections are significantly different from either the Overall figures or those for Owners.   
5   The YES and NO percentage responses of CCFJ members are not significantly different from one another or from those Overall or for Onwers
6    Only the respondent trait Interest shows a causal relationship with respondents' position on this issue.
* * * * * * * * * * * *  * * * * * * * *  INTEREST * * * * * * * *   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  REGION [8]  * * * * * * * * * * ADDITIONAL REMARKS  MADE * * 
BOARD * * * GENDER [5] * * *  CCFJ MEMBER [7] WEST EAST PRIORITY COMMENT
OVERALL OWNER MEMBER [1] LAWYER C.A.M. [2] OTHER [3] N.A. [4] MALE FEMALE D.K. [6] YES NO NORTH CENTRAL COAST COAST SOUTH ONLY ONLY BOTH NEITHER
OVERALL TOTALS 1033 740 130 7 13 8 135 584 389 60 196 837 35 202 156 137 503   176 131 418 308
% WITHIN CATEGORY 100.0% 71.6% 12.6% 0.7% 1.3% 0.8% 13.1%   56.5% 37.7% 5.8% 19.0% 81.0% 3.4% 19.6% 15.1% 13.3% 48.7%   17.0% 12.7% 40.5% 29.8%
ADJUSTED # [9] 1015 728 130 7 12 8 130 583 382 50 191 824 34 201 154 132 494 171 129 414 301
# OF YESes 925 678 105 7 10 7 118 525 356 44 179 746 33 184 147 118 443 158 109 383 275
# OF NOs 90 50 25 0 2 1 12 58 26 6 12 78 1 17 7 14 51 13 20 31 26
COLUMN % YES [10] 91.1% 93.1% 80.8% 100.0% 83.3% 87.5% 90.8% 90.1% 93.2% 88.0% 93.7% 90.5% 97.1% 91.5% 95.5% 89.4% 89.7% 92.4% 84.5% 92.5% 91.4%
t-Test on % YESes [11] 2.2 -11.6 9.9 -8.7 -4.1 -0.4 -1.2 2.3 -3.5 2.9 -0.7 6.6 0.5 4.8 -1.9 -1.6 1.4 -7.4 1.5 0.3
COLUMN % NO [10] 8.9% 6.9% 19.2% 0.0% 16.7% 12.5% 9.2% 9.9% 6.8% 12.0% 6.3% 9.5% 2.9% 8.5% 4.5% 10.6% 10.3% 7.6% 15.5% 7.5% 8.6%
t-Test on % NOes [11] -2.2 11.6 -9.9 8.7 4.1 0.4 1.2 -2.3 3.5 -2.9 0.7 -6.6 -0.5 -4.8 1.9 1.6 -1.4 7.4 -1.5 -0.3
1 STD. DEVIATION [12] 0.9%
% YESes Row [10] 100.0% 73.3% 11.4% 0.8% 1.1% 0.8% 12.8% 56.8% 38.5% 4.8% 19.4% 80.6% 3.6% 19.9% 15.9% 12.8% 47.9% 17.1% 11.8% 41.4% 29.7%
% NOs Row [10] 100.0% 55.6% 27.8% 0.0% 2.2% 1.1% 13.3% 64.4% 28.9% 6.7% 13.3% 86.7% 1.1% 18.9% 7.8% 15.6% 56.7% 14.4% 22.2% 34.4% 28.9%
Calculated Chi-Squared Value [13]: 0.2960X10^-6   [13] 0.1774 0.1632 0.1231 0.0492
Implication of Chi-Squared Test RELATIONSHIP FOUND INDEPENDENT INDEPENDENT INDEPENDENT INDEPENDENT
2 ROWS X 3 COLUMNS
© 2008 Cyber Citizens for Justice, Inc.   Deland, FL