TABLE 12: BAR HOA BOARDS FROM REQUIRING OR LIMITING INSTALLATION OF HURRICANE SHUTTERS OR LIMITING OPENING OR CLOSING APPROVED SHUTTERS
KEY FINDINGS:   1   Overall 76.6% of respondents want HOA boards barred from requiring or restricting installation of hurricane shutters or setting time limits on opening or closing approved shutters. 
2   Boldfaced values in the rowd of column YESes and Noes differ significantly from the overall average as they are at least 3 standard deviations away from that value.  The disparities are notable only within  
               the respondent traits of Interest and Region.
3   The percentage YES and NO responses of some Non-owner Interest groups, notably Board Members and Other, are statistically significantly different from the corresponding ones of Owners 
               and Overall.  
4   Percentage YES and NO responses in the Gender, CCFJ Membership, and Additional Remarks Made sections are not significantly different from either the Overall figures or those for Owners.   
                  Only the Northern Region is significantly more in favor of the this recommendation. 
5   The YES and NO percentage responses of CCFJ members are not significantly different from one another or from those Overall or for Owmers
6   None of the respondent traits had a potentially causal relationship with respondents' positions on this issue.
* * * * * * * * * * * *  * * * * * * * *  INTEREST * * * * * * * *   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  REGION [8]  * * * * * * * * * * ADDITIONAL REMARKS  MADE * * 
BOARD * * * GENDER [5] * * *  CCFJ MEMBER [7] WEST EAST PRIORITY COMMENT
OVERALL OWNER MEMBER [1] LAWYER C.A.M. [2] OTHER [3] N.A. [4] MALE FEMALE D.K. [6] YES NO NORTH CENTRAL COAST COAST SOUTH ONLY ONLY BOTH NEITHER
OVERALL TOTALS 1033 740 130 7 13 8 135 584 389 60 196 837 35 202 156 137 503   176 131 418 308
% WITHIN CATEGORY 100.0% 71.6% 12.6% 0.7% 1.3% 0.8% 13.1%   56.5% 37.7% 5.8% 19.0% 81.0% 3.4% 19.6% 15.1% 13.3% 48.7%   17.0% 12.7% 40.5% 29.8%
ADJUSTED # [9] 1024 740 125 7 12 8 132 584 387 53 190 834 34 197 155 136 502 173 131 416 304
# OF YESes 784 567 87 4 9 5 112 452 290 42 150 634 31 162 123 102 366 133 98 327 226
# OF NOs 240 173 38 3 3 3 20   132 97 11 40 200 3 35 32 34 136 40 33 89 78
COLUMN % YES [10] 76.6% 76.6% 69.6% 57.1% 75.0% 62.5% 84.8% 77.4% 74.9% 79.2% 78.9% 76.0% 91.2% 82.2% 79.4% 75.0% 72.9% 76.9% 74.8% 78.6% 74.3%
t-Test on % YESes [11] 0.0 -5.3 -14.7 -1.2 -10.6 6.3 0.6 -1.2 2.0 1.8 -0.4 11.0 4.3 2.1 -1.2 -2.8 0.2 -1.3 1.5 -1.7
COLUMN % NO [10] 23.4% 23.4% 30.4% 42.9% 25.0% 37.5% 15.2% 22.6% 25.1% 20.8% 21.1% 24.0% 8.8% 17.8% 20.6% 25.0% 27.1% 23.1% 25.2% 21.4% 25.7%
t-Test on % NOes [11] 0.0 5.3 14.7 1.2 10.6 -6.3 -0.6 1.2 -2.0 -1.8 0.4 -11.0 -4.3 -2.1 1.2 2.8 -0.2 1.3 -1.5 1.7
1 STD. DEVIATION [12] 1.3%
% YESes Row [10] 100.0% 72.3% 11.1% 0.5% 1.1% 0.6% 14.3% 57.7% 37.0% 5.4% 19.1% 80.9% 4.0% 20.7% 15.7% 13.0% 46.7% 17.0% 12.5% 41.7% 28.8%
% NOs Row [10] 100.0% 72.1% 15.8% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 8.3% 55.0% 40.4% 4.6% 16.7% 83.3% 1.3% 14.6% 13.3% 14.2% 56.7% 16.7% 13.8% 37.1% 32.5%
Calculated Chi-Squared Value [13]: 0.0194 0.6034 0.3898 0.0124 0.5647
Implication of Chi-Squared Test INDEPENDENT INDEPENDENT INDEPENDENT INDEPENDENT INDEPENDENT
2 ROWS X 4 COLUMNS 2 ROWS X 4 COLUMNS
© 2008 Cyber Citizens for Justice, Inc.   Deland, FL