TABLE 11: BAR HOA BOARDS FROM INTRODUCING RENTAL RESTRICTIONS NOT ALREADY IN THE DOCUMENTS UNLESS A SUPERMAJORITY OF HOMEOWNERS APPROVES
KEY FINDINGS:	1	Overall 75.1% of respondents want restrictions imposed on renting property in their HOA.
	2	Boldfaced values in the rows of column YESes and Noes differ significantly from the overall average as they are at least 3 standard deviations away from that value.  The disparities are notable within
		all respondent traits, especially Interest, except for CCFJ membership.
	3	Some percentage YES and NO responses in the Region and Additional Remarks Made sections differ significantly from the Overall figures as well as those for Owners.
	4	The YES and NO percentage responses by lawyers are the second of two instances with more negative than positive results.  Some 57% of attorneys oppose the recommendation to bar
		boards from introducing rental restrictions without having the approval of a supermajority of HOA homeowners.   C.A.M.s and "Other" were split evenly on this issue.  Even so the
		tiny number of votes cast by these three Non-Owner Interest groups should warn readers not to assign too much credibility or importance to these results.
	5	All of the percentage YES and NO responses in the Gender section differ significantly from the Overall values, Owners and one another.
	6	The YES and NO percentage responses of CCFJ members do not differ significantly from one another or from those Overall or of Owners.
	7	Respondents' Interest and Gender traits had potentially causal influences on their responses to this question.
				* * * * * *	* * * * *  INTEREST * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *													* * * * * * *  REGION [8]  * * * * * * * *						* * ADDITIONAL REMARKS  MADE * *
					BOARD						* * * GENDER [5] * * *				CCFJ MEMBER [7]					WEST	EAST			PRIORITY	COMMENT
		OVERALL		OWNER	MEMBER [1]	LAWYER	C.A.M. [2]	OTHER [3]	N.A. [4]		MALE	FEMALE	D.K. [6]		YES	NO		NORTH	CENTRAL	COAST	COAST	SOUTH		ONLY	ONLY	BOTH	NEITHER
OVERALL TOTALS		1033		740	130	7	13	8	135		584	389	60		196	837		35	202	156	137	503		176	131	418	308
% WITHIN CATEGORY		100.0%		71.6%	12.6%	0.7%	1.3%	0.8%	13.1%		56.5%	37.7%	5.8%		19.0%	81.0%		3.4%	19.6%	15.1%	13.3%	48.7%		17.0%	12.7%	40.5%	29.8%
ADJUSTED # [9]		1025		737	130	7	12	8	131		581	385	59		190	835		34	201	155	134	501		175	131	417	302
# OF YESes		770		568	93	3	6	4	96		461	268	41		145	625		26	152	125	103	364		131	92	311	236
# OF NOs		255		169	37	4	6	4	35		120	117	18		45	210		8	49	30	31	137		44	39	106	66
COLUMN % YES [10]		75.1%		77.1%	71.5%	42.9%	50.0%	50.0%	73.3%		79.3%	69.6%	69.5%		76.3%	74.9%		76.5%	75.6%	80.6%	76.9%	72.7%		74.9%	70.2%	74.6%	78.1%
t-Test on % YESes [11]				1.4	-2.7	-23.9	-18.6	-18.6	-1.4		3.1	-4.1	-4.2		0.9	-0.2		1.0	0.4	4.1	1.3	-1.8		-0.2	-3.6	-0.4	2.2
COLUMN % NO [10]		24.9%		22.9%	28.5%	57.1%	50.0%	50.0%	26.7%		20.7%	30.4%	30.5%		23.7%	25.1%		23.5%	24.4%	19.4%	23.1%	27.3%		25.1%	29.8%	25.4%	21.9%
t-Test on % NOes [11]				-1.4	2.7	23.9	18.6	18.6	1.4		-3.1	4.1	4.2		-0.9	0.2		-1.0	-0.4	-4.1	-1.3	1.8		0.2	3.6	0.4	-2.2
1 STD. DEVIATION [12]		1.4%
% YESes Row [10]		100.0%		73.8%	12.1%	0.4%	0.8%	0.5%	12.5%		59.9%	34.8%	5.3%		18.8%	81.2%		3.4%	19.7%	16.2%	13.4%	47.3%		17.0%	11.9%	40.4%	30.6%
% NOs Row [10]		100.0%		66.3%	14.5%	1.6%	2.4%	1.6%	13.7%		47.1%	45.9%	7.1%		17.6%	82.4%		3.1%	19.2%	11.8%	12.2%	53.7%		17.3%	15.3%	41.6%	25.9%
Calculated Chi-Squared Value [13]:				0.0043							0.0017				0.6732			0.3497						0.3578
Implication of Chi-Squared Test				RELATIONSHIP FOUND							RELATIONSHIP FOUND				INDEPENDENT			INDEPENDENT						INDEPENDENT
				2 ROWS X 4 COLUMNS
													© 2008 Cyber Citizens for Justice, Inc.   Deland, FL