TABLE 1: WILLING TO PAY $4 PER HOUSEHOLD PER YEAR TO FUND AN INDEPENDENT REGULATORY AGENCY TO PROTECT HOA OWNERS
KEY FINDINGS: 1    Overall 93.0% of the respondents are willing to pay $4 per year to fund an agency to protect HOA owners,  This is a very important finding in the light of claims by some lobbyists and politicians
that Florida HOA owners don't want or need such an agency and are unwilling to pay for it.  Those familiar with the statistical technique to test that notion can determine the odds of that 
assertion being correct for themselves with the data in this table.   Those unable to do that might like to know that there's far less than one chance in one billion of that assertion being correct.
2    Boldfaced values in the row of column YESes and Nos differ significantly from the overall averages as they are at least 3 standard deviations away from those overall averages.
3     The percentage YES and NO responses of Interest groups other than CAMs differ significantly from the Overall values.  While Board members and 
4              While Attorneys favored this recommendation, they were significantly less in favor than Overall or Owners.  The Northern and West Coast Regions were significantly more favorably
             disposed than either the other regions or the Overall response.  
    The YES and NO percentage responses of members and non-members of CCFJ essentially were the same and not statistically significantly different than the Overall figures.
5     The Chi-squared test indicates possible causal relationships between two traits of respondents, Interest and Additional Comments Made, and their answers to this question.
 
* * * * * * * * * * * *  * * * * * * * *  INTEREST * * * * * * * *   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  REGION [8]  * * * * * * *  * * ADDITIONAL REMARKS MADE * * 
BOARD * * * * GENDER  * * * * *CCFJ MEMBER* WEST EAST PRIORITY COMMENT
BOARD * * * GENDER [5] * * *  CCFJ MEMBER [7] WEST EAST PRIORITY COMMENT
OVERALL OWNER MEMBER [1] LAWYER C.A.M. [2] OTHER [3] N.A. [4] MALE FEMALE D.K. [6] YES NO NORTH CENTRAL COAST COAST SOUTH ONLY ONLY BOTH NEITHER
OVERALL TOTALS 1033 740 130 7 13 8 135 584 389 60 196 837 35 202 156 137 503   176 131 418 308
% WITHIN CATEGORY 100.0% 71.6% 12.6% 0.7% 1.3% 0.8% 13.1%   56.5% 37.7% 5.8% 19.0% 81.0% 3.4% 19.6% 15.1% 13.3% 48.7%   17.0% 12.7% 40.5% 29.8%
ADJUSTED # [9] 992 740 130 7 12 7 96 560 374 58 189 803 34 194 148 131 485 169 126 401 296
# OF YESes 923 706 111 6 11 7 82 516 356 51 174 749 33 180 143 122 445 163 110 380 270
# OF NOs   69 34 19 1 1 0 14 44 18 7 15 54   1 14 5 9 40 6 16 21 26
COLUMN % YES [10] 93.0% 95.4% 85.4% 85.7% 91.7% 100.0% 85.4% 92.1% 95.2% 87.9% 92.1% 93.3% 97.1% 92.8% 96.6% 93.1% 91.8% 96.4% 87.3% 94.8% 91.2%
t-Test on % YESes [11] 2.9 -9.5 -9.0 -1.7 8.6 -9.4 -1.1 2.6 -6.3 -1.2 0.3 5.0 -0.3 4.4 0.1 -1.6 4.2 -7.1 2.1 -2.3
COLUMN % NO [10] 7.0% 4.6% 14.6% 14.3% 8.3% 0.0% 14.6% 7.9% 4.8% 12.1% 7.9% 6.7% 2.9% 7.2% 3.4% 6.9% 8.2% 3.6% 12.7% 5.2% 8.8%
t-Test on % NOes [11] -2.9 9.5 9.0 1.7 -8.6 9.4 1.1 -2.6 6.3 1.2 -0.3 -5.0 0.3 -4.4 -0.1 1.6 -4.2 7.1 -2.1 2.3
1 STD. DEVIATION [12] 0.8%
% YESes Row [10] 100.0% 76.5% 12.0% 0.7% 1.2% 0.8% 8.9% 55.9% 38.6% 5.5% 18.9% 81.1% 3.6% 19.5% 15.5% 13.2% 48.2% 17.7% 11.9% 41.2% 29.3%
% NOs Row [10] 100.0% 49.3% 27.5% 1.4% 1.4% 0.0% 20.3% 63.8% 26.1% 10.1% 21.7% 78.3% 1.4% 20.3% 7.2% 13.0% 58.0% 8.7% 23.2% 30.4% 37.7%
Calculated Chi-Squared Value [13]: 0.2155*10^-16   [14] 0.051 0.5358 0.2378 0.0024
Implication of Chi-Squared Test Relationship Present INDEPENDENT INDEPENDENT INDEPENDENT RELATIONSHIP PRESENT
© 2008 Cyber Citizens for Justice, Inc.   Deland, FL