|
Are
Villagers living south of highway 466 second-class citizens? Are
Villagers living north of highway 466 first-class citizens? Why?
What’s the difference? Residents
south of the highway cannot vote for their central district government
officials who make all the big decisions in their community. The
residents north of the highway can at least vote for supervisors on a Resident
Advisory Council (RAC) that has a direct input on an advisory basis into the
decision-making process of the VCCDD supervisors on amenity and recreation
issues. Some view this as a first
step to having the residents directly control that decision-making process
through a Resident Authority Board (RAB) which might be possible some time in
the future. The
difference here is profound – the POA believes that residents should control
their own elected government. Residents
should control decision-making for issues in their own community.
Without
this vital element of control, residents suffer “Taxation Without
Representation.” The monthly
amenity fee is not exactly “Taxation,” but the “Without
Representation” part of the phrase is appropriate in The Villages. The
first test of this advisory input just occurred with the RAC voting
unanimously to strengthen penalties for abuse of the golf tee-time system.
The VCCDD will take this up for consideration at its November meeting.
Most expect the proposal endorsed by the RAC to be passed by the VCCDD. However,
the VCCDD only speaks for the residents north of highway 466.
Only residents north of the highway have official input into the
deliberations and decisions of the RAC. The
residents south of highway 466 have no representation on the RAC. On
this particular question regarding abuse of the tee-time system, the central
district staff under Ms. Janet Tutt has said the proposal would also be taken
to the SLCDD for consideration. The
reasoning here is that any change in the tee-time system would have to be
uniform in all of The Villages to be effective.
But,
the SLCDD will see the proposal without any input from SLCDD residents south
of highway 466. Without
consideration and input from its residents, what should the SLCDD do? This
is the dilemma for the SLCDD and its residents. And,
this is also the crux of the second-class citizen problem for SLCDD residents. Residents
south of highway 466 need to have their own RAC. However,
there is a problem – a big problem. The
developer of The Villages started the discussion about the RAB, which evolved
into the RAC, after completing the build-out of the properties north of
highway 466 and the subsequent sale to the VCCDD, with the developer’s own
hand-appointed supervisors, at grossly inflated prices. The
developer hasn’t completed the build-out of the properties south of highway
466 and doesn’t want a resident board voting on, or perhaps vetoing, the sale
of those properties to the SLCDD at inflated prices. In
the VCCDD area, we estimate the total value of the bond debt assumed by
residents and the related interest at over $500 million.
The tab for south of highway 466 could easily top $1 billion.
Residents are required to pay off those bonds out of their monthly
amenity fees. Residents cannot
approve or reject this requirement. The
developer might eventually allow a RAC for the south side – but, not for
another five or so years until the full build-out. So,
south side residents appear doomed to be second-class citizens until then with
no effective voice in the big decisions made for them by the developer’s
hand-appointed supervisors on the SLCDD. This
is their Taxation Without Representation. However,
it doesn’t have to be that way. South
side residents might be able to get a RAC for themselves if they loudly demand
to have this voice in their community now. An
accommodation with the developer over common facilities might be possible to
balance the interests of both parties. But,
residents have to speak up and let the SLCDD know that residents demand this
role in decision-making now. If
SLCDD residents want to vote on this, they can schedule it for November, 2008,
when the county’s election apparatus will be in place. The
place for residents to speak up is at the SLCDD meeting on the second Friday of
the month at 8:00 a.m. in the district offices in Laurel Manor.
Also, at your individual residential CDD meeting (see day and time
schedule in this Bulletin). The
RAC meeting, open to all residents, both north and south of highway 466, meets
on the Wednesday before the second Friday of the month in the district offices
on In summary, south side residents can have a voice in decision-making in their community. But, this won’t be handed to them on a silver platter. Residents will have to speak up and fight for their own RAC. Until then, they will continue to be second-class citizens. And, they will continue to suffer “Taxation Without Representation.”
Good news! The Village Greens organization recently had a conversation with Gary Moyer, VP of Development for the developer, about the recycling program that has been under consideration for us here in The Villages. Well, it looks like it is going to happen!
The latest news is that the Wildwood transfer station has been completed and they are just awaiting approval from the Department of Environmental Protection to start operating. If every thing moves along as planned, we could be recycling at curbside by Thanksgiving.
The method is called, “single stream recycling”. What that means to you and me is that once a week we will fill a clear plastic bag with all of our recyclable items and place it at the end of our driveways. Glass, soda cans, cardboard, paper, newspaper, food cans, plastic containers; all in one bag.
The bags will be picked up, taken to Wildwood, placed in larger trucks and transferred to Orlando where the contents will be sorted in a state-of-the-arts “murfing” facility. The contents will be separated, bailed and then sold to vendors whose business is marketing the material and/or recycling.
It has not been definitely decided as of this writing, but anticipate a small (less than $2.00) monthly increase in your trash pickup bill. That sounds pretty reasonable to me. I have been lugging my recyclables to the Rolling Acres collection station every week. This service will be far easier and cost me less in gas running back and forth weekly.
We have fought long and hard for recycling to come to The Villages. Once it gets here let’s all enthusiastically be part of it.
If all of us get behind this we can make an enormous difference in helping clean up our planet. We will be protecting our resources, our environment, and our quality of life.
The Environmental Expo put on by the Village Greens in October was a smashing success. There were over 1400 people that attended this first Expo, and the Village Greens signed up 52 new members bringing this young club’s membership to close to three hundred in just seven months.
The next Village Greens meeting is November 28th at 6:30 p.m. at the Laurel Manor Recreation Center. We will be showing a film on Solar Power.
The
next POA general membership meeting will be held on Wednesday, November 21, in
the A
spokesman from the Performing Arts Alliance will explain the plans for the
proposed We
also plan to provide an update on the activities of the Vinyl Siding Committee. If you haven’t been to one of our meetings in the past, please join us on November 21, the evening before Thanksgiving. Coffee and donuts afterwards make for a nice social time. And, the discussions and opportunity to meet fellow Villagers add up to a thought-provoking and interesting evening
Annual election for POA officers and directors will be held at the general membership meeting on November 21. Announced
candidates are:
President Joe
Gorman
Vice President Open
Treasurer Frank
Carr
Secretary Mary
Paulsboe
Director Jack
Ryan
Director Marty
Rothbard Director Lynton Goulder There are several director slots open. Additional nominations can be made at the meeting or before. Anyone wishing to consider running for an officer or director slot should call Joe Gorman at 259-0999 before the meeting for more information.
Just
a short reminder about the nominations for the POA Hall of Fame.
Nominations are due by the end of November.
A final decision will be made by the POA Board of Directors in early
December. The Hall of Fame honorees
will be identified at the December 19 meeting when they will be formally
inducted in the Hall of Fame. So, if you have any person(s) you wish to nominate for this honor, ask Joe Gorman (259-0999) for the Nomination Form. Also, contact Frank Renner, chairman of the Hall of Fame Committee, at 750-0306. And, with time running out, please do it sooner rather than later. Cheers
- To Mother Nature for the rain and cooler temperatures. Jeers
- To Governor Crist for lobbing the hurricane insurance time bomb into our
laps. Cheers
- To Louis Bremer, recently resigned CEO of the Leesburg Regional Medical
Center (LRMC), the owner of the Cheers
- To The Villages Regional Hospital for receiving the Premier/CareSciences
Select Practice National Quality Award for being among the top 1% of Jeers
- To the yard maintenance companies charging far in advance for their services
and then failing to perform as required. Residents
should be alert to these scams and never pay in advance for landscape
services. Anything in advance is
too much. Sadness
- Although we mourn the passing of Flower, we celebrate her life, courage,
leadership, and family. She will
be missed. Flower, please give our
best to Shakespeare. Cheers
- To the newspaper delivery people who double-bag the newspapers on rainy
days. Thanks. Cheers
- To Janet Tutt, Administrator of the Central Districts, for cutting through
the doubletalk and making the Congratulations
- To the Red Sox on winning the World Series.
Cubs, you’re next. Remember,
Cubbies, 2008 will be the 100th season since the last Series win in 1908. Jeers
- To the Daily Sun for completely dropping the ball on reporting the details of
the CSST problem in The Villages. You
would think that on such an important safety issue, that the Daily Sun would
have reported on this for the benefit of Villagers rather than blindly following
what we think is its “don’t report anything negative” policy that supports
the developer’s sales effort. Cheers
- For entertainment on the Squares. It’s
getting better and better. Jeers
- To the developer for not having the foresight to plan for more late night
entertainment places in the Jeers
- To the central districts for not trimming the dead fronds from palms all over
The Villages. Sure, you save money,
but that is at the expense of having an unsightly mess and what is probably a
real fire hazard. Jeers - To Roger Kass, president of the VHA, for refusing to resign over his conflict of interests regarding the ongoing Vinyl Siding controversy. The
POA has a Forum on its website. A Forum is a cyberspace meeting place where residents can leave comments on any topic they wish to comment on. If you want to comment on the new Resident Advisory Council, you can do so on the POA Forum. If you want to comment on the second-class status of residents on the south side, you can do so on the POA Forum. If you want to start a new topic, you can do so on the POA Forum. Just go to the POA website, click on the POA Forum, and follow the directions. Select a topic, review the previous comments, and then, if you want to, leave your own comments. Start a new topic if you want to.
So,
if you have something on your mind that you want to talk about, the POA Forum is
the place for you. Or, if you just
want to see what your neighbors are saying, the POA Forum is still the place for
you. Give it a try at www.poa4us.org . On
Friday, October 12, a Vinyl Siding Committee member responded to a
resident’s inquiry and looked at the siding installation on a home in the
Crestwood Villas. The
homeowner had recently purchased the villa and had already called Home
Warranty to have the siding checked out. The
homeowner informed our Committee member that the contractor’s representative
had come by and, without spending any substantial time looking over the house,
told her there was nothing wrong with her siding, that it was all fixed before
her closing. She wanted a second
opinion. The
Committee member’s list of observations was quite lengthy, and included the
following items: Panels
not lapped 1-1/4” (many lapped 3”); J-Channel
resting on shingles, and very wavy J-Channel; Short
panels; Damaged panels; Panels
not in the lock on the front porch; A
very large belly on the rear of the home; 3
bellies on one long side of the home; and
more... Why
would a contractor’s rep tell this homeowner that everything had been fixed,
everything is OK, and yet these flaws are easily noted within a few minutes of
looking at her home? As
we have suggested in previous issues of The Bulletin, every homeowner should
look down the length of their home from the front corners and from the back
corners. Look carefully.
Many problems are easily spotted this way.
Look for bulges (bellies) and panels that are wavy instead of straight.
We
have noted these problems in many neighborhoods, lately in Crestwood and From
what we understand these Villas were built by Dodd McDowell. Villages
residents need to be able to trust their builders (contractors and
subcontractors) to be honest about evaluating and repairing siding problems, not
just minimize homeowners’ concerns about these problems.
Contractors need to realize that these issues are not resolved by denials
or halfway fixes. Home buyers in The Villages want, and deserve to have,
properly constructed homes. We
again suggest that any resident that has a concern about their siding
installation request that a Committee member look at their home, or have an
independent Home Inspector do a more thorough examination and document the
problems found. If
you recall the lesson of the fox guarding the hen house, it may not be wise to
rely solely on the builder’s opinion as to whether any repairs or corrections
are needed. Conversely,
our Committee members are retirees from the construction industry, who are your
neighbors and have nothing to gain, and who have volunteered to share their
knowledge and experience by showing other homeowners what they see. Finally
the vinyl siding installers are going to class! The
Vinyl Siding Committee has heard that now all the siding installers are
required to go to classes to learn about correct siding installation.
Now for sure there should be no excuse for shoddy work or not going by
the book. They will just have to
apply what they learn, with an attention to quality, not just speed.
Maybe
we are finally on our way to a resolution.
More than thirteen months of perseverance is beginning to get results.
And if this is true, we thank the contractors for taking this giant
step forward. However,
we must all continue to be vigilant in watching the way the installations are
being done to make sure they are indeed going by the book. We find some steps
are being overlooked. For example, the Vinyl Siding Institute (V.S.I.) manual
states on page 35, Step 5 (the italics have been added for emphasis): “Install
undersill trim under/over the window as a receiver for the cut siding.
Undersill trim is used any time the top lock or bottom lock has been
removed from the siding. Furring may
be needed to maintain the face of the panel at the desired angle.” Page
35, Step 6: “Use
a snap lock punch to place lugs in the cut edge of the panel every 6 inches.” That’s
SIX inches, NOT 24 inches as we have been finding. Page
33, Step 7: “When
panels overlap, make sure they overlap approximately 1-1/4 inches.
Note: Overlap with factory cut ends whenever possible.
If you must use cut ends, duplicate the factory notches before
installing.” That’s
1-1/4 inches, NOT the 2-1/2 or 3 inches as we often find. These
are just a few of the proper installation steps that have been consistently
ignored in the past and that we now hope will be consistently applied on all new
siding installations, as well as on repairs.
For example, we will also expect to find finish trim where V.S.I. says it
should be and to see staggered overlaps so that all seams are separated by at
least 3 courses. As
for the “stepped” look, for best visual appearance it should be avoided.
Why would we not want our homes to look their best?
The contractors & subs did this shoddy work, let them fix it properly
at their own cost, not ours. Let
them FAIRLY present the alternatives so the homeowners have the choice to have
their house look its best. We find
that many owners are unaware that the siding did not have to be “stepped” in
the first place. Thank
you again, Dean Carter and New Look Exteriors, for continuing to do the right
thing. They are the best contractor
and the best siding contractor, from our observations. If the contractors and
subs would all do the same, there would be no need for a Vinyl Siding Committee
at all! We
hope that the workers and the contractors will now be able to take some pride in
knowing the right way to do an installation and following through each and every
time. It would be great to just get
this done right once and for all and not have to continue publishing all the
inconsistencies. Let’s make each
step a step forward!
I
have a question for Villages contractor Dodd McDowell: How could you do this
to a customer? A
year ago I purchased a home built by Dodd McDowell. Most of you may have read
his name before, most likely in connection with complaints about construction. The
problems with my home are what prompted me to become a Vinyl Siding Committee
member. I want all of our homes to be well built. That’s what we were
supposed to get when we bought here. Our committee has received more
complaints about construction problems on homes built by McDowell Construction
than the other contractors. McDowell’s
men re-sided my house TWICE, and even when they were finished for the second
time there was a belly on the gable end that can be seen from the road. Why
won’t they fix it? I paid for a complete home, not one with bellies. I paid
the price they asked. They cashed my check. My check was good. They
took my money. But McDowell’s work is flawed and should be corrected
without excuses and evasion. I
was told by Dodd McDowell and Rick Murray, the head of the contractors, that the
framing was done according to code. At another time I was told by Mr. McDowell
and his framer that they would give me the lumber and I could fix it myself. Am
I to understand that framing with bellies is according to code? Are home buyers
expected to make framing repairs themselves on new homes? Not where I come from.
I am pursuing that question through the building inspector. More
importantly, why should I even have to argue and fight about this to get it
resolved. Why isn’t the developer standing behind the product and requiring
the builders to correct these defects? Many people have never been involved in
construction and are not aware of many construction problems, but I do know the
difference and I want my house done right! I
feel bad for anyone who purchased a Dodd McDowell house. If you have any
problems with your home, you will probably have to do battle to get it taken
care of, just like me. I feel let down by The Villages management who has
allowed these siding and framing problems not only to occur, but to continue on
and on, unresolved. I doubt Mr. Schwartz would ever have allowed this to happen.
Now they are in such a hurry to make the sale and get the money, but don’t
have the integrity to fix the problems that are pointed out. What a
disappointment! Home
Warranty asks in a survey at the end of the first year if I would recommend The
Villages to friends and relatives. Of course, the lifestyle and amenities are
commendable, but certainly NOT the quality of the construction, particularly the
construction on my McDowell home, as well as other homes I have observed as a
Vinyl Siding Committee member. Nor could I recommend based on their willingness
or ability to correct problems. Homeowners have to struggle to get repairs done
correctly, often involving multiple visits from workers who do an inadequate or
incomplete job. Some issues still have not been resolved on my home or on
others’ homes. It should not be this way for new homeowners in The Villages. I
have heard that another contractor, Dean Carter, is much better at correcting
the problems that are found. If he can do this, why won’t McDowell? Had I
known about this before, I would have bought a Carter home. Why is Dodd McDowell
still allowed to build in The Villages? We deserve better. Vince
Mazone Villages resident and
Independent
volunteer efforts are underway to get a state-of-the-art, 1500-seat performing
arts center built in our community. There are currently more than 100 active
volunteers in the Villagers Performing Arts Alliance (VPAA) involved in these
efforts. Currently,
an independent Feasibility Study paid for by donations to the VPAA is underway
which involves intensive interviews of about fifty community leaders by an
outside consulting firm. Also underway is an on-line opinion survey. Thousands
of Villages respondents are expected to take part in this survey. The
question is, would you yourself please participate? It will only take you a few
minutes, and would be most helpful in determining whether the capital campaign
goes forward. To
participate, please go to: www.donovanmanagement.com/vpaa.htm (Just
type this web site address into your browser and hit “return” on your
keyboard. Please note that vpaa.htm must be in lower case) Your
answers to the questions will be confidential. At the conclusion of the survey,
only overall results will be reported. Also,
if you're interested in learning more about the VPAA, please visit their website
at www.villagerspaa.org. Or, send an email to Tom Bender (tombethbender@comcast.net)
asking him to email you the monthly VPAA newsletter. P.S.
You are cordially invited to attend the next VPAA Volunteers Meeting: 7 p.m.
Monday, November 5, at Laurel Manor Recreation Center. They are in a campaign
right now to add new volunteers. Also, a member of the VPAA will explain the effort to build a state-of-the-art Performing Arts Center in or close to The Villages at the monthly meeting of the POA on Wednesday, November 21, at the Laurel Manor Recreation Center at 7:00 p.m. In
the most recent issue of the POA Bulletin someone suggested the use of compact
fluorescent bulbs in the exterior post lamps in the Villages.
While these bulbs are a great way to go green the package states in the
"! Caution" box that these bulbs are not to be used in lighting
fixtures controlled by dimmers, electronic timers or photocells.
Our exterior post lamps are controlled by photocells therefore, these
bulbs are not a viable option. Sheila Buerkle
Editor’s Note: Some of the compact fluorescent bulbs cannot be used in conjunction with timers, photoelectric cells, or dimmers. Some of the newer ones can be used in these applications. Be sure to read the label and any cautions for directions on the specific use you are planning. Below is the
Fourth POA Residents’ Survey. All
residents are asked to spend a few minutes filling out this form, but, please,
just do it once. Please rate
each question with your opinion on a scale of 1 to 10 where 10 would be your
highest, best, or most satisfactory rating – all the way down to 1 which would
be your lowest, worst, or least satisfying rating.
A rating of 5 would be an average, or middle-of-the-road, answer.
If you have no opinion or no information about a question, or it does not
apply to you, please put in “NR” (No Rating) for that question. Then, either
bring this form to the next POA membership meeting or you can mail it to:
The POA Survey,
Some
residents have asked why the POA does its periodic POA Survey when The Villages
already does an annual survey and publishes partial results in the Daily Sun. A
related question is why even do a survey when most residents are perfectly happy
with The Villages and wouldn’t have moved here unless they were happy with
what they saw. On
the first question, the POA has been disappointed with the annual survey done by
The Villages. It just seems like
that survey misses the opportunity to address some of the hard issues of concern
to residents. We have often said
that the survey seems to sidestep the important issues and whitewash the results
of what is surveyed. The
POA has come to view The Villages’ survey as much too general, incomplete, and
lacking in enough details that can be measured on a continuing annual basis. Hopefully,
this POA Survey addresses some of these concerns.
Take a look at some of the questions listed on the right.
Don’t you think that we should be asking these questions, getting the
answers, and doing something about any problems uncovered? On
the second question, we agree that most people are happy living here.
But, that doesn’t mean that no issues exist that could be addressed
and, if solved, would make our community an even better place in which to live. So,
let’s do this POA Survey and see what we find.
Let’s not whitewash issues. And,
let’s be honest about what is good and what is not-so-good about The Villages.
Maybe we can make this place better for all of us. There are 50 questions. To complete the entire questionnaire, on two sides, should not take longer than a few minutes. Thanks in advance for helping on this survey. The
POA has conducted three previous Surveys. The
first was conducted in late 2002 and reported on in the February, 2003, issue of
the Bulletin. The second was
conducted in April and May, 2004, and reported on in June, 2004.
The third was conducted in October, November, and December, 2005, and
reported on in January, 2006. All
three of these are available for review on the POA website in the archived
Bulletin section. As
we report on this 2007/2008 POA Survey in a few months, we will show comparison
to the earlier Surveys where appropriate. Rather
than go into details right now on previous Surveys, and perhaps influence this
year’s results, let’s just do these general comments listed below: The
earlier Surveys showed favorable opinions of The Villages on the general
questions and various resident services. The
Villages Media Group generally showed good marks for the radio and TV station.
The Daily Sun, however, didn’t fare as well and was marked down for
objectivity. The
golf program got so-so marks, but the executive golf program fared better. The
POA scored better than the VHA as an organization and for its newspaper. The
lowest scores in both surveys were recorded by various elements of our local
governments. Only
twelve more weeks till the end of the year
-- and our deadline looms.... Scary! We
have collected over 500,000 total petitions.
To be on the safe side, we still need at least another 200,000
validated petitions. Believe
it or not, we are getting emails and phone calls from voters who fell for
Thrasher’s letter - the revocation ploy.
Even though we're confident that we will prevail in our lawsuit against
the nefarious revocation scheme, that it will be found to be unconstitutional
and will get thrown out, we can't afford to be complacent or take any chances,
and so we must collect extra petitions to compensate for any revoked
petitions. Please
sponsor a quick petition drive to help us get where we need to be through your
favorite group, neighborhood, friends, church---wherever and with whomever you
hang out. Send 50, 100. or 500
petitions. These last 3 months can
make or break this campaign. Think
about this
-- .how bad will it be if for some awful reason we don't make it to the
ballot and you didn't do your share? Please
help make this happen. Send
petitions and donations--both together is best! Lesley
Blackner Founder
& President FHD ******************************* Below
is a reprint of a newspaper article explaining the tactics of the opposition to
the Florida Hometown Democracy initiative. ******************************* Hometown
Democracy Facing
Slimy Scare Tactics Land-use
initiative facing BY
CARL HIAASEN The Miami Herald
You
can be sure you're on the right side of an issue if John Thrasher is on the
other. The
former Florida House speaker and big-shot lawyer-lobbyist has sent out a
mass-mailing to scare voters into removing their signatures from a statewide
petition in favor of the "Florida Hometown Democracy" amendment. The
Hometown Democracy initiative would let citizens vote to approve or reject
major changes to the comprehensive land-use plans in their counties or cities.
For the first time, Floridians would have some direct control over how their
communities grow. Thrasher's
deceptive and slimy letter is proof of the panic that has set in among those
who've made a fortune raping the state and are afraid of losing their sweet
ride. The
lobbyist ominously warns that, if the Hometown Democracy amendment passes,
"special interests" will triumph and "Big Developers" will
wreck Florida's "scenic beauty." Like
it's not happening now? Special
interests already manipulate many county and city commissions - not to mention
the Legislature - while What
Thrasher neglects to reveal in his fright mailing is that big developers and
landholders are the ones most frantically opposed to the Hometown Democracy
movement, and that he himself represents some of the biggest, including the
St. Joe Co. that is selling off the Panhandle. He
says allowing the voters to decide whether they want a new megamall or condo
tower down the street could stifle growth and cause taxes to go up - another
cynical fiction designed to frighten middle-class workers and the elderly. What
really causes taxes to soar is the need for increased services due to over
development and overcrowding. Bad planning means that the public ends up
paying dearly and repeatedly for more roads, fire stations, police patrols,
water-treatment plants and schools. Lots
of folks in Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties will tell you that
runaway growth has done nothing but push up their tax bills and diminish the
quality of their family's lives. All
over the state, Floridians are disgusted by the failure of their elected
officials to do restrained, responsible planning. That's why the Hometown
Democracy petition has momentum. While
it might not be the perfect answer to derailing the engine of manic greed that's
ruining so many lovely places, many residents are so heartsick and frustrated
that they would welcome a dramatic change. According
to the internet Web site www.floridahometowndemocracy.com,
petition supporters have collected about 331,000 verified signatures of the
611,009 needed to place the amendment on the November 2008 ballot. Thousands
more signatures are awaiting validation. The deadline for signing is Feb. 1,
only four months away, which has lent urgency to the opposition's propaganda
blitz. Nothing
is so horrifying to some developers and corporate interests as the prospect of
having to deal directly with citizens when trying to get a building project
passed. It's much easier to woo politicians, whose loyalties often can be
purchased with a hefty campaign contribution or outright bribes. That's
the way things have always worked in Predictably,
opponents grandiosely calling themselves Floridians for Smarter Growth have
cooked up a rival constitutional amendment that would require 10 percent of
voters in a city or county to sign a petition, before any land-use referendum
takes place. The
petitions could be signed only at the office of a municipal clerk or elections
supervisor, an inconvenience that virtually guarantees a fatally low turnout. Obviously,
the forces behind Floridians for Smarter Growth aren't interested in
participatory democracy. They want
the public to shut up and let the politicians do their thing. According
to the South Florida Sun-Sentinel, the group raised $841,000 between April and
August. Major donors included the National Association of Home Builders, the
Florida Chamber of Commerce and U.S.
Sugar. It's
a motley roster of special interests whose motives are anything but pure. The
Hometown Democracy movement undoubtedly was the prime target when
pro-development legislators passed a law allowing voters to revoke their
signatures from amendment petitions. That
opened the door for John Thrasher's specious letter pretending to denounce the
very developers for whom he's shilling. In urging citizens to abandon the
Hometown Democracy campaign, he blames "slick lawyers" for tricking
them into putting their names on the petition. Thrasher
himself is one of the slickest lawyers in Tallahassee, and it is he who has
stooped to shameless trickery. His
scare letter comes with a postage-paid envelope. Mail it back with the two-word
reply of your choice. Carl
Hiaasen writes for ***************************************************************************************** HELP
SAVE WHAT'S LEFT OF FLORIDA...LET THE PEOPLE VOTE to control growth! Help
put HOMETOWN DEMOCRACY on the 2008 ballot Please
download and SIGN THE PETITION ! http://www.FloridaHometownDemocracy.com
The
Florida Chamber of Commerce, which has long crusaded against the right of
citizens to amend the Florida Constitution through petitioning, is now paying
their professional collectors $3 per signature for their “Smart Growth”
petition! The Chamber, with a huge war chest funded by St. Joe Corp, Big Sugar,
Miami Corp and other major land developers, is rapidly buying their way onto the
ballot! Florida
Hometown Democracy is funded only by our grassroots supporters and a few groups
like our good friends at Florida Chapter Sierra, and doesn’t have the finances
to do likewise. If
you want to save what’s left of Florida and see Hometown Democracy on the
ballot, we need you to go all out with us and start sending in lots of petitions
now! ... for Now that "fall" is here, there are many opportunities to collect petitions: before football games, art festiv |