|
|
The
developer of The Villages announced plans to determine whether to give
Villagers north of highway 466 voting authority over the VCCDD.
The
determination involves a two stage process.
First,
Villagers must decide if they want to have this voting authority.
This would be handled in a “straw vote” this November in the
general election. Villagers will
vote on whether to create an “Authority Board” under Chapter 163 Florida
Statutes which would eventually take over direct responsibility for any VCCDD
decisions regarding the residential areas under VCCDD administration.
It
was cautioned that all of the details of the arrangement have yet to be worked
out. It is possible that Villagers might decide to continue the
current situation in which the developer effectively has control of
governmental decision-making in the VCCDD.
If the vote is negative, the current situation would continue whereby
the VCCDD makes all big decisions in its administrative area. Second,
if the straw vote is positive to the idea, each area under VCCDD
administration would send a delegate to an organizational meetings to decide
on the details and scope of resident control.
This would include CDDs #s 1, 2, 3, 4, the VCCDD, and the Lake County
portion of The Villages. Then
a second election would be held in 2008 to select an official representative
from each of the residential areas. For
now, this plan only applies to the VCCDD administrative area north of highway
466. The
VCCDD would retain responsibility for all the bonds issued previously as well
as for the administrative functions relating to the VCCDD’s commercial areas
in the various shopping plazas. The
Resident Authority Board (RAB), however, could have responsibility for
supervision of all recreation facilities, services, maintenance, staff, and
administration. The
POA generally applauds this arrangement and thinks that it can be good for
residents. This is consistent
with the POA’s long-time plea for residents to have the vote for the
supervisors of the central districts. It
makes no sense in our community for residents to be denied the vote and
effectively disenfranchised. This
is our community and we should have the vote to decide issues on our own.
Some
other comments come to mind, as follows: 1.
Source of Idea - This idea originated from the developer.
So, let’s not have any misunderstanding about who is the power in The
Villages. As the POA has thought
for a long time, the developer calls the shots and the VCCDD follows the
company line. However,
we want to congratulate the developer for his foresight and good will in
finally seeing the light and passing that authority back to the residents.
But,
let’s not get ahead of ourselves at this point – let’s see it happen
first. 2.
Horse is Gone - This is, unfortunately, like closing the door after
the horse is gone. All of the big
money decisions in the VCCDD administrative area have already been made.
These were primarily the sales of common property by the developer to
the VCCDD that saddled residents with over $500 million in debt (over $1
billion if you add in interest). We
had no say in those decisions, and we had to accept the debt repayment
obligations pushed upon us. So,
with the horse gone, we are left with the smaller and routine decisions.
3.
Second Class Citizens? - Since this decision only applies to the VCCDD
administrative area north of highway 466, we have to ask if the SLCCD
residents south of highway 466 would be relegated to second class status?
The POA thinks that a comparable Authority Board could be set up for
south of highway 466 in the SLCCD area that could address similar issues.
Residents here should campaign hard for this with the SLCDD board at
its monthly meeting at 8:30 a.m. on the second Friday of the month at the
Laurel Manor district offices. The
myriad of construction decisions that the developer and his staff need to make
could be excluded. But residents
could address resident issues, just like in the VCCDD area, including sales of
common property. Wouldn’t this
be fair to residents? Wouldn’t
this be consistent with the decision to give residents the vote north of 466?
Wouldn’t this be the way to avoid calling some of us “second-class
citizens”? 4.
Asset Sell-Off - This sets the stage for the developer to start
selling off his extensive real estate holdings in the VCCDD central district.
Every parcel of real estate sold would now carry with it one voting
share in the VCCDD elections. If
the developer were to sell enough properties, it is possible that voting
control of the VCCDD would pass to some other company which would have no
interest in the residential areas of The Villages.
This would be unacceptable. Thus,
this Authority Board concept allows voting control of the VCCDD to eventually
pass to residents. We
would not expect this to be an issue with a buyer of the developer’s
interest in the VCCDD commercial properties. 5.
Better Decisions? - If the initial promise of true resident control is
accomplished, we should not have any more of the arbitrary and unpopular VCCDD
decisions of the past. This
includes: the closing of the Chula Vista club, whether to have a Christmas
parade, the aborted Activity Policy, unpopular golf policies, the squabble
over the renovation of the Paradise Center, the sinkhole repair on Nancy Lopez
golf course, the closing of the Silverlake club, sweetheart deals for the
developer passed by his hand-appointed supervisors, repair of the recreation
trails, etc.
Perhaps residents will also be able to take control of the purchase of
common properties from the developer. Perhaps
we will also get more sanity into the administration of the Covenants and
Restrictions policy. Perhaps we
will also have hiring and firing authority over the administrative staff. 6.
Devil Details - The devil is in the details.
A positive vote in November only sets the stage for the Resident
Authority Board to negotiate agreements with the VCCDD regarding control of
the residential decision making. We will have to see how accommodating the developer will be
in the process of giving up control. A
hard line and only a token give-up regarding minor issues will also be
unacceptable. 7.
Dark Cloud - We are happy about the possibility of removing the dark
cloud that hangs over the relationship of the residents with the developer.
Let’s put an end to the autocratic rule of the developer in which
residents have no say in the big decisions.
Let’s also give credit to the developer for creating our fabulous
community with our wonderful way of life.
Perhaps this is the way to move forward in a more positive relationship
so that we can acknowledge the great work of the developer.
We hope so. 8.
Need To Vote - The first step, and the really critical step, is to
vote in November. Only if the
vote is positive will this plan proceed.
We should hear a great deal more about this in coming months.
So, stay tuned, study the issues, and be sure you are fully informed
when it comes time to vote. This
will be your chance to make a really critical decision in your community. In
Summary, the POA looks forward to seeing more details about this
proposed Resident Authority Board and how it might work.
Let’s hope it delivers on its initial promise for the benefit of
residents. J Below
is a copy of an email I recently received regarding illegal golf tires. I sent this and my comments below it to Pete Wahl and Ken
Creeley: “I
am protesting the golf cart tire replacement policy that the Villages has issued
starting July 1st, 2006. I have
driven my golf cart on the Villages golf courses for 19 years.
I am on my second golf cart. I
drive the cart paths, use the 90 degree rule and avoid wet and fragile areas on
the golf courses. I have NEVER torn up the golf course with my tires.
I believe the project was inadequately researched and hastily concluded.
We will still have the heavy over sized carts and the high speed carts.
These are what tear up our courses.
We need to change driver attitudes -- not tires!!” After
receiving this email, I spoke to numerous maintenance people on the courses who
agree that course damage is not
from standard tires being used on the vast majority of carts. How come there's a
problem now after these tires have been used for over 15 years on our courses?
And why don't other courses outside the Villages which also get constant play
have the problems or restrictions we do? If the operators of the courses want
players to not use certain tires, they should ask that we comply with same when
replacing our tires as they wear out. They also should have set up guidelines
for us when we came here prior to our buying carts.
Further, I feel that this issue should have been advertised at the
clubhouses & courses as opposed to the way it is being handled.
Since
this is a golf cart community, my wife and I use our carts almost exclusively
within The Villages instead of our car. Though
we play golf several times a week, substantially more miles are clocked on the
recreation trails and streets. We
want the safest tires available, and those that meet D.O.T. standards are far
superior to tires recommended for golf course use by their manufacturers! Several
letters to the editor have come to us regarding the recent change in the golf
winnings policy. Most of these
object to the new policy of awarding credit vouchers rather than Villages
dollars or cash. Most of the
letters criticize the new policy because of the high cost of merchandise in
the country club pro shops. The
POA researched the issue, and learned the following from the USGA web site:
In
general, the USGA says amateurs should not play for cash prizes of any amount
in large, organized events [more than a few foursomes] where playing for the
money is not optional, there are no prizes other than cash or the fact that
cash prizes will be awarded is advertised. In
view of the above, the USGA would urge groups not to award cash prizes. By
awarding merchandise of gift certificates redeemable for merchandise instead
of cash, the group would ensure that the amateur status of the players is not
even brought into question. It
does look like the USGA allows amateurs to accept prize vouchers for other
than cash (i.e., merchandise) for no more than $750 retail.
But, the USGA seems to hold the line that amateurs cannot accept cash
prizes of any value. Any
decision on this issue in The Villages will be made by Ken Creeley.
If you and many others beat the drums on this issue with him, you might
get some accommodation. It is
going to take a groundswell of comments from concerned golfers here to make
the point and campaign for change. At the very least, the POA would recommend that credit vouchers be accepted throughout The Villages at businesses owned by the developer, and that discounts be given for the use of the credits at the pro shops. Sustainability
of existing groundwater withdrawal, future growth, and protecting our
wetlands, lakes, and rivers is a difficult balancing act.
Florida derives much of its economic prosperity from the
“building and growth industry.” If
a scenario were to come to pass where the “building and growth
industry” was dramatically diminished, what would that do to our
economy? On the other side of
the coin, if the “building and growth industry” remains unchecked,
what will that do to our fragile Florida interconnecting network of the
aquifer (groundwater), lakes, rivers and wetlands?
Building
a consensus and compromise is the foundation of a good democracy.
The consensus and compromise must be built on solid facts and
science; to do otherwise is to disadvantage one party. Because
we live in a republic, we have delegated the fact finding, the science and
the research to various State and Federal agencies.
The state agencies with the responsibility for the “science” of
the impacts on our ecosystem from massive development in the state are the
“Water Districts.” The
Water District in the Citrus/Sumter and counties immediately to the south
is SWFWMD. In
the 1970’s the Florida legislature passed a law requiring the Water
Districts to establish “minimum flows and levels” for all major rivers
and lakes in the state. The
intent was to set a quantifiable “bench mark” to establish level and
flow criteria at which the interests of the people of Florida would not be
further negatively impacted by additional withdrawals. It
is now 2006, some 35 years after this law was enacted, SWFWMD has just
proposed the levels for lakes in Sumter and Citrus counties.
Why has it taken so long? In
quite a few cases, the lake levels are already at or below the minimum low
levels, indicating the lakes have already been impacted. The
building and growth industry is just realizing that their industry is in
jeopardy because with these types of documented impacts, there will be no
new issuances of Water Use Permits from SWFWMD.
The building industry’s first step is to challenge the science and
discredit the facts in an effort to keep the industry boom running
unchecked. This is not how to
build a consensus. Wise
elders have said that all things are best taken in moderation -- otherwise
the result will be suffering. We
believe that this is true in government also.
The
present growth of our state is not in moderation -- it is a building rate
unmatched in our history. It
appears that the majority of political power rests in the hands of the
building and construction industries; and these indirectly control the
funding, political appointments, and careers of the people in the Water
Districts as they try to establish the facts and science of the impacts of
the unchecked growth on our groundwater, lakes, rivers, and wetlands. Our
founding fathers foresaw events such as these.
They tried to establish a government with a balance of power.
So, if abuses occurred in one area, relief could be sought in
another, specifically the judicial one. It
takes commitment, focus, talent and money to successfully win a fight like
this. Is the fragile interconnecting network of aquifers, lakes,
rivers and wetlands worth preserving and protecting?
Is it worth fighting for? Only
YOU can help stop this tragedy from completely unfolding. To
see where you can help, either financially or with your time, contact your
Too Far chapter or Citizens for Clean Air and Water. Louise
Racine Member,
Citizens for Clean Air & Water Board member of Too Far Congratulations
again to Spruce Creek on achieving resident home rule.
The developer has exited the development and turned all assets over
to a homeowner’s association (HOA) for administration and maintenance. You
might want to consider whether this could also be done here in The Villages.
But, there are differences that would prevent the same arrangement
being done here. Most
significantly, all Spruce Creek community properties and buildings were
turned over (deeded) debt-fee to the homeowners. The
developer basically just gave the facilities to the homeowners.
He did this because part of the price of the residents’ homes and
lots paid back the developer for the cost of the common facilities. Thus, the developer recovered his investment up-front. We
couldn’t do that in The Villages because the developer chose to sell these
back to the residents rather than give them to the residents.
Theoretically, the cost of our homes and lots were less than would be
the case if handled like Spruce Creek.
But, somehow, that doesn’t seem to be the case.
Actually,
it seems like we are paying twice for these common facilities.
The first time when we bought our house; the second time when the
developer sells the same properties to the central districts at inflated
prices. Also,
we are paying off a debt burden that in the VCCDD area approaches 60% of our
monthly amenity fee. This is debt
issued to pay the developer for these common facilities.
In Spruce Creek, they are debt-free. Spruce
Creek has not increased the monthly fees in three years.
In the case of The Villages, our fees will go up yearly, forever, at
the same annual rate as the CPI. Bill
Nelson, United States Senator, Democrat, Florida, recently visited the Villages
to conduct a Town Hall Meeting. A
local resident asked the Senator for assistance in the resolution of the Florida
Statue 190 problems being encountered here in The Villages. The
Senator responded by saying the people must become seriously dedicated to
holding their elected officials responsible for doing what is right.
The people must adamantly express their frustrations and be
self-responsible. Just a few people
cannot make changes; it takes many people becoming involved in whatever needs to
be changed and acting in concert. The
POA considers this good advice. It
appears that many new and renewing members of the POA have the idea that, just
by paying their dues, effective remedies to problems within the local government
will take place. It is not all that
easy. Members of the POA need to
get actively involved. A handful of
people cannot tackle the problems, needs, and demands of a rapidly growing
community. Furthermore,
it is disappointing to see the people who complain and say:
You are wasting your time; Nothing can be done; The Villages is too
powerful. Absolutely
nothing is going to change until individual residents get behind an organization
that is willing to take the lead and commit their personal energies to assisting
it. Look around and you will find
there is no organization, except the POA, that is willing to take on this
challenge and lead those residents who are willing to participate. Get involved!! It
is your community now!! Are you ready? Are you willing to send out letters or emails or join a protest where necessary? Are you willing to go to CDD and POA meetings? Are you willing to speak up at meetings? THE POA NEEDS YOU. The
POA needs some volunteer help from members. Call Joe at 259-0999 for details. We
have a number of openings on the POA Board of Directors and various committees
for members who want to get more active in the POA.
You might find that the time requirement is not great and the personal
rewards are truly gratifying. Our
Sergeant-at-Arms is away for the summer, so we need a person to fill in until
October or so. Duties include
positioning the American Flag at the front of our meeting room, being
responsible for the green felt table cloth at meetings, and keeping order. We
could use the help of an attorney on a variety of projects.
A background in local government law, real estate, litigation, or
contracts would be helpful.
Below
is a copy of a letter sent by Village residents to Mr. Curt Hills at the
Villages Daily Sun: Curt: I always enjoy reading the escapades of the Sumter County Commission.
The Sun does a fine job on keeping all informed of their "goings
on." I
have a suggestion - do some investigative reporting on Marion County and
how they have "disenfranchised" 5,189 Villagers.
In
particular, I am referring to how Marion County roads are maintained in the
Villages, and the fact that, the maintenance of these roads by the residents
was agreed upon "...with the Developer as a condition for the project
approval." What we residents
of Marion County are finding out is that, contrary to what many of us were
told when looking at The Villages, the roads are not maintained by the county. In fact, l00% of the road maintenance is by the citizens. We
-- the residents of The Villages in Marion County -- with a back room deal
between The Villages and the County Commissioners -- have had our roads
declared as "private roads" with mandatory public access so the
gates have to be open to all - and as Commissioner McClain has advised --
"...The County is prohibited by law from spending public money on private
roads." What
he does not explain is that the public money he says we cannot spend on our
roads is our tax dollars -- which they readily take from us in the form of
gasoline taxes (for road maintenance) and our property taxes.
Now,
in Florida, we heard how our citizens were "disenfranchised" when
some claimed voting difficulties -- how about being
"disenfranchised" in back room deals -- collecting taxes --
redistributing our taxes elsewhere in the county -- and, by the way, not
telling the good folks of The Villages of Marion County about it.
This
is the next great surprise - after the Nancy Lopez sink hole.
When
the roads need repair -- to the tune of thousands and thousands of dollars --
the cost will be simply divided by the 5,189 homes and they will be sent a
bill. The Villages has no obligation -- per their agreement with
county -- to do anything. Lastly,
the CDD4 and VHA know about this -- but it is not the hot topic at meetings. It would interest me to know how other citizens would feel if
they woke up tomorrow and found all the tax money collected for roads in their
subdivisions would not be spent on them -- that a back room deal made them
private roads for public use (wouldn't you think that somewhat of an
oxymoron?). In any event, it certainly seems like a story an investigative reporter hot on the trail of county shenanigans may want to look at and inform the uninformed. The
Pete’s Place column in the Daily Sun will soon be replaced by another
column. The new column, named
“Our Place,” will be similar in content, but a rotational writing effort
of Pete, Janet Tutt, Monica Andersen, and John Rohan. The
effort by Mr. Wahl was worthwhile and an effective way to keep Villagers
informed about various activities and issues in our community.
We trust that the new
version of the column will be as informative. However,
we have to say that Mr. Wahl too often seemed to run out of material and had
to fill the space with fluff. We
remember one column in which Mr. Wahl instructed us in the various intricacies
of sun block lotions. He
concluded that column with reference to “that big, golden orb in the sky.”
On
other occasions, he mused about football, or told us about his hip surgery
experience. Nice -- but not
community informative. We think the new column should focus on issues of interest to the homeownership experience and governmental situation here in The Villages. No fluff -- just the facts. Patti
Davis, daughter of former president Ronald Reagan, wrote the following about
her father in the July 16, 2003, issue of Newsweek.
This has been condensed for space requirements here. ******************************* Sometimes
I think we need to look no farther than the pattern of footprints stretched
out behind us to understand the lives we’ve lived.
We
can follow the first tentative steps of our infancy through the long,
defiant strides of adolescence and young adulthood -- the running away
years, the years of putting distance between ourselves and our families, of
burning up time -- to the more solid footprints, set down as we grow older. These
are the tracks we leave on the earth. If
we look closely we can also see our parents’ footprints, often close to
us, as they guide and lead us, at other times far behind, as they wait for
us to turn and remember them. We
slow down, finally, to look longer and more carefully at our parents.
My father, who strode confidently onto the stage of history ... was
always polite – achingly so – and even in the depths of his illness,
still (was).... I didn’t stop
to linger on the sweetness of that quality, or to learn from it. There
are people who would say that my father’s footprints are larger and deeper
than those of other parents because his political legacy gives them weight,
creating indelible marks in the halls of history....
I see his footprints pressed into the wet sand of the beach as he
walked toward the sea to catch steep waves and ride them back to shore. His stride was as smooth and certain as it was when he walked
into the White House, and onto the stage of history. I see a small girl on that beach as well, pressing her feet
into the shapes that her father’s feet have left to see how much bigger
his footprints are. I
have gotten lost in those footprints during my life; I have fought hard and
bloody battles to pull myself away. These
are the tracks I have left on the earth.
But now I look for my father’s tracks on every beach, every trail. Because they mark the way home. We
apologize -- we were unable to print an annual Mother’s Day story in the
last issue because of space considerations.
So, here is our Mother’s Day story: Once
upon a time there was a child ready to be born.
The
child asked God, "They tell me you are sending me to earth tomorrow, but
how am I going to live there being so small and helpless?"
God
replied: "Among the many angels, I chose one for you.
Your angel will be waiting for you and will take care of you." The
child further inquired, "But tell me, here in heaven I don't have to do
anything but sing and smile to be happy." God
said, "Your angel will sing for you and will also smile for you every
day. And you will feel your angel's love and be very happy." Again
the child asked, "And how am I going to be able to understand when people
talk to me if I don't know the language?"
God
said, "Your angel will tell you the most beautiful and sweet words you
will ever hear, and with much patience and care, your angel will teach you how
to speak." Then
the child asked, "God, I am leaving now, please tell me my angel's
name." "Her
name is not important. You will
simply call her Mom." (author unknown) We
stay put for this next meeting. The
June 21 meeting will be in the Hacienda Recreation Center.
We will be in this room for at least the next month until the Paradise
Recreation Center is re-opened. The
sexual offender and predator website is http://www3.fdle.state.fl.us/sexual_predators/.
We have the entire local database in a 3-ring binder for viewing at the POA
monthly meetings. If
you see Bulletins lying in the street or the gutter after delivery, or if you
know a house is unoccupied, please pick up the Bulletins and either hold them
for the resident’s return, or discard them.
This is especially important during windy or rainy weather. If you need help on any elder healthcare issue or problem, please call the Shine Elder Help line at 1-800-963-5337. You can also call Harold Barnes, a Villages resident, at 753-8810. Or you can talk to Harold personally at any one of the POA monthly meetings. He has a table display and is ready to talk or help.
The
article in today's Daily Sun, "Center district to discuss resident
board," is great news for all Village residents, and it is certainly a
wonderful surprise. My
congratulations to you, the POA Board, and the POA membership for all your
considerable efforts to make this proposal a potential reality. You
have done a great job so far and I recognize there is much more to do in the
future. Thanks much. This
is a continuation of comments we received in the recently completed Villages
Survey. As space permits, we
will continue this listing of comments in the future. ******************************** Mail
Delivery · With
respect to idea of mail delivery to homes rather than to a postal station;
since these are county roads, we should be getting house delivery.
Postal stations were built originally because streets were to be
private and eligible for house delivery. ·
Leave mail delivery as is: 1)
less traffic 2) safety issues 3)
no ugly mail boxes. ·
Home mail delivery would be good for those less mobile, but would create a
need for mail boxes and another or several vehicles on streets. ·
We definitely need and are entitled by law for mail delivery to home.
Sooner or later many of us will not be able to drive or walk to
mailboxes. ·
Can you imagine the cost of home mail delivery!
At least $30,000,000 in salaries, benefits, etc.
It would probably work if they had any guts in Washington and
privatized the whole lousy postal system. ·
My understanding this that the developer made a contract with USPS for what
we have. I would be thrilled to get good mail service.
Florida and The villages mail service is worse than any I’ve ever
had. ·
Mailboxes will be a landscaping nightmare.
Will cheapen the look of our community ·
Postal stations are better, safer and give exercise to many residents.
This comes from a retired postal employee. ·
I like going for mail, meeting others there.
With regard to the cleanliness issue, postal stations need a hosing
to get rid of bugs just like our houses do. ·
We very much need a golf cart accessible post office in Sumter Co.
At the very least, a mail box in the shopping center with 2 pick ups
with the mail routed the same way as Oxford P.O. (much quicker). The
Hospital ·
Hospital billing for emergencies is very low, but wait time is long and care
is done by too few, a tired few. ·
Why should we pay for the hospital? I use this term loosely. It
was more like a MASH unit. I
almost died there. ·
The Villages Regional Hospital should look for benefactors or commercial
support (Target, Home Depot, Wal Mart) then come to the fund raising and tax
idea. The
POA · I love
reading the POA Bulletin, but I get tired of the continual whining.
The whining should stop, just report. ·
Your paper is too critical and one-sided; definitely not objective.
You seem to oppose everything the developer wants without attempting
to see “the big picture” or get his viewpoint.
I don’t enjoy reading The POA Bulletin.
Its too nasty. I do not
belong to either organization (VHA or POA). ·
It is sad that so many do not see the validity of the POA by wearing
blindfolds while the greed and power sickness is taking over. ·
We think the POA meetings and the POA Bulletins are very informative. ·
You’re doing a great job. We
appreciate everything you have attempted to do whether you succeeded or not,
we know you at least tried. ·
POA keep up the good work of keeping us apprized of what the developer is
doing that we don’t know about and/or don’t like.
Your continued support is absolutely invaluable to use. ·
Keep up the good work! Your
newsletter and “The Reporter” are our only “fair and balanced” look
at what is really happening here. ·
Keep up the good work. Someone
has to. Please accept my membership and donation. ·
You represent the residents but most of your newsletter is opinions that you
try to turn into facts so that you can criticize someone. ·
Happy to have the POA to give me a more complete picture of what is
happening in The Villages. ·
Broadcast distribution of POA Bulletin draws attention to unoccupied homes.
Better to leave at postal stations for pick up by owners in
residence. ·
Will the POA survey make any difference?
I sure hope that it would. Please
show the results to the Morses. ·
Some of your articles are quite interesting but unbelievable.
Need more real explanations & facts. ·
Post a list of candidates on your website showing those favorable to the POA
and those against the POA. Tues.
Nov. 8 is Election Day. I
don’t know who to vote for. ·
POA is a very negative paper. The
developer is a business man similar to the management of Publix, CNBS, etc.
Your approach of criticism is far to the left. Take your argument to Sumter, Marion, Lake governing bodies
not VHA. ·
I am happy in The Villages. The
concept is great. I am saddened
by the mercenary attitude of the developer.
I don’t think Harold Schwartz had the same outlook.
Keep letting the light into the dark corners and we will all benefits ·
There’s a lot I don’t know. As
a wise commentator once said, “All I know is what I read in the papers.”
So please keep digging and reporting the truth. ·
Thanks for being our voice. Continue
to keep up the good work and keep us informed as you are our only source of
actual facts. ·
Villages is a fine place to live. Keep
up the good work of the POA. Keep
emphasizing what’s been done well and question and bring to task
shortcomings that you see to make The Villages even better ·
Would like to see some positive articles in your paper. ·
Stop trashing the streets with this negative POA bulletin.
Then the POA Board should go back to whatever state they lived.
Then the POA Board should get a life.
This “paper” is a joke. ·
You tell us all the problems, but never see any solutions. ·
This is a very good survey. The
Village survey is meaningless. June 21, 2006 THE
NEXT POA GENERAL
MEMBERSHIP MEETING Third
Wednesday of the Month – 7:00 p.m. Hacienda
Recreation Center Our
Threatened Water Resources” Talk
By an Official from the St. John’s River
Water Management District COFFEE
AND DONUTS FOR
ALL AFTER THE MEETING ALL
RESIDENTS WELCOME – COME AND JOIN US |