Article Courtesy of The Daytona
News-Journal
By Jennifer Edwards-Park
Published January 10, 2016
PALM COAST — Owners of a defunct golf course in Palm Coast's L section say
they're almost ready to unveil plans for the property. Meanwhile, city code
enforcement fines continue to mount at $500 per day.
The former Matanzas Woods Golf Course off Lakeview Drive contains 275 or so
acres of former fairways and greens along with vandalized buildings that once
comprised the course's clubhouse. Golf hasn't been played there for nearly a
decade.
And Stephen Richardson of
The Group Golf of Palm Coast LLC, which recently paid off the
note on the foreclosed property for about $205,000, isn't ready
to reveal the fate of the course.
"We have been approached by quite a few people about doing
something with it and we're taking meetings this week and next
week on the property — not for sale or purchase — on different
concepts," Richardson said. "When we are ready to present it (to
the city), we will present it. We are moving forward."
Meanwhile, the tally for code enforcement fines was at $66,500
as of Wednesday, city spokeswoman Cindi Lane wrote in an email.
"The fine continues to run until
compliance," she wrote. |
|
Fields that were once part of the Matanzas Woods Golf Course in the
L-section of Palm Coast have become overgrown, and no golf has been
played there in nearly a decade.
|
Mayor Jon Netts said, "It’s not a question of being maintained to golf course
standards, but you have to maintain the property to a certain extent."
Richardson doesn't want an acrimonious relationship with the city.
"Our tractor person will be starting again at the end of next week to keep (the
grass areas) maintained," he said. "I have been meeting with the neighbors.
There hasn't been any complaints or anything else."
He said workers had been cleaning up trash and debris at the clubhouse area. And
despite appearances, "there's nothing wrong with the buildings. Kids had gone
(in the building) and trashed the drywall."
He said that during the late summer, three different tractors and various bush
hogs worked on the golf course but there was a three-month stretch when it
rained almost daily.
"We've got a different tractor and ... we'll be back at it next week," he said
Wednesday. "We're relatively close to presenting the community with what our
plans are."
Some city and county officials doubt very much that those plans will include
reopening a golf course.
Flagler County Property Appraiser Jay Gardner pointed to the plummeting value of
golf courses nationwide, using as an example a course on the beach side that
went from being worth $37 million to just $4 million in just a few years.
"Nobody wants to build golf courses," he said. "How much is the city losing on
its (taxpayer-supported) golf course? Golf courses don’t make money."
He also said that right now, the Group Golf parcel is zoned recreational, which
limits its value. Gardner's office had estimated that at around $204,000 but he
thinks that might be a little high because that figure doesn't take into account
the state of the buildings.
"Unless you have the right to get rid of the golf course and build subdivisions,
what are you going to do with it?” Gardner said.
Netts doesn't see the land ever being used as a golf course again either.
"A number of residents in the area are insisting that the property be operated
and maintained as a golf course. Given what we see in terms of national trends,
that’s probably not realistic," he said. "People aren’t going to invest money
unless there is a reasonable return on investment."
He said one option might indeed be to allow building on the property and turn a
portion of the course into a park.
"There is property next to the course already zoned single-family residential,"
Netts said. "It probably would not be deleterious to the neighborhood, and might
be beneficial."
If the owners' plans include building on the property, the process to get
approval will take a while, said Lane, the city spokeswoman.
"Any zoning change of the property from golf course to residential would require
the change to go through the public process. That includes neighborhood
meetings, public hearing with the Planning & Land Development and Regulation
Board, and two public hearings with the City Council," she wrote in an email.
"The owner would have to apply for any rezoning change and then would meet with
city staff first. The process would take months."
Lane said as of Wednesday, the city has not received any applications with
regard to the property. |