Kings Gate residents, developer clash |
Article Courtesy of The SUN-HERALD By Josh Salman Published April 7, 2010
PORT CHARLOTTE — Residents of the Kings
Gate retirement community in Port Charlotte say they know they signed a bad
contract, they just don’t know what to do about it.
Property owners say developer Nathan
Benderson is unilaterally raising community fees, and forcing them to spend
money at his restaurant and golf course. Language in the community’s governing
documents also allows him to
The community’s homeowners have had
enough, and they want the language retracted, even if it means a lengthy legal
battle.
“A contract can’t be open
More than 200 residents
The complex’s homeowners
They say Benderson also has been cheating
the homeowners association out of nearly $250,000 annually, and deleted language
in the community’s covenants that would have forced him to turn control over
to the homeowners association
“I wish I could enter into binding
contracts and unilaterally change them,” said Ed Wotitzky, an attorney
representing Kings Gate residents. “That would be like if I sold you a house
for $10,000, and after you sign, I turn around and say, ‘Oh, by the way, now
you owe me $100,000.’”
The residents’ group had a meeting with
Benderson’s staff last week in an attempt to resolve the issue.
If they can’t come to an agreement by
fall, the group likely will vote on a decision to bring the battle to court. But
with little precedence and case
Bob Spanos, director of development for
Benderson’s company, did not return phone calls seeking comment Tuesday, but
he previously said he has no plans to retract the debated language.
He also said only about one-third of the
community’s 575 residents are upset. The development has 973 home sites.
The community’s residents even have
pressured state lawmakers for help, with little success.
“These developments have such strong
lobbyists, and they claim everything is
But not all community members are on the
same page.
If the issue were forced into the courtroom,
residents would be looking at a shared $50,000 in legal costs, and there’s no
guarantee they’ll win.
Some say that risk greatly outweighs any
possible reward.
“I don’t like what Mr. Benderson is
doing, but the cost is just too much,” said Dawn Amiclum, 59. “The bottom
line is the developer is within his legal rights, and this could go on in the
courts for years.” |