THE ASSOCIATION "COLOR POLICE" |
An Opinion By Jan Bergemann Published March 16, 2007
Proponents of homeowners' associations always claim that these associations protect property values -- and always come up with the example of a neighbor painting his home hot pink -- or violet -- with polka dots.
remove $19,000 worth of artificial turf in his garden. Please read the whole story: Turf war ruffles wealthy Marco Islanders. It seems the city had rules against artificial turf -- that actually looked perfect -- but had no rules restricting homes painted with weird colors!
Most wars over colors are fought in homeowners' associations over the taste of colors. Often enough communities don't have straight color guidelines, but boards make decisions, often depending on their own personal tastes. And the "approved" colors seem to change depending on the taste of the president's wife – or the female president of the board! Very often these color wars are getting out of hand -- as a family in Port Orange found out. They had lost their home’s roof to a hurricane. After a month of waiting to replace the roof, they finally replace it with beige tiles. Then the association sued them because black tiles were the approved color for tiles. The regular black tiles were not available at the time -- and the next hurricane season was looming on the horizon. Finally, a kind roofing company replaced the beige tiles with black ones -- for free -- in order to avoid another color war! Realtors will tell you that the potential buyer’s first "view" is very important -- and the home’s exterior is a big deal-maker! So, if a buyer falls in love with a pink home, the new homeowner surely thinks it's his good right to repaint it in the same color as the original home. Not so, said the board of a homeowners' association in Palm Beach County, and sued a homeowner who repainted her home in the original colors. The following lawsuit was a lot more expensive than painting and repainting together. But the dispute surely made the attorneys happy! Just recently the Villas Del Mar Property Owners' Association in Boca Raton barely escaped a very expensive legal confrontation. A homeowner, who asked for permission to repaint his home in the original colors, was threatened -- verbally and in writing -- that the paint color wasn't approved, because in the opinion of the board the paint used wasn't the original shade! This is the home in question! Would you consider this home a threat for the neighbors' property values.
personally insulted, slandered and threatened with fines and lawsuits.
Here a little paragraph from the December 2006 issue of The Villas Voice:
During meetings it escalated into personal attacks that ended in some owners withdrawing their candidacy for upcoming board elections. One "would-be" candidate stated: "Who wants to serve on the same board with such individuals?"
The big damage was finally prevented when a poll among homeowners created an obvious result -- according to The Villas Voice (Edition February 2007):
I guess the board member writing this article couldn't help but add some nastiness to a result that obviously showed that common sense isn't quite dead - yet -- and proved some board members wrong! It seems that many folks forget that we live here in Florida, The Sunshine State. Not only the sun, but as well our salty air (If you live near the ocean) bleaches out the colors and creates -- after some years -- the impression that a certain color has a much lighter shade! So, if you use the original paint -- exactly the same shade and manufacturer -- the color of the home will automatically look much darker when it is first painted. Colors fade -- but frustration and hostility often linger! Which leaves the question:Is it worth all the anger and frustration? Definitely not! Let's equip THE COLOR POLICE with some common sense! |