DBPR ARBITRATORS ALLOW RIGGED RECALLS TO SUCCEED

An Opinion By Jan Bergemann 
President, Cyber Citizens For Justice, Inc. 

Published January 14, 2008

  

Rulings made by arbitrators of the DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS AND MOBILE HOMES can only make you wonder if they are trying on purpose to destroy the legislative intent of our Florida statutes.

  

And the folks willing to abuse our already shaky system have quickly found out that some of these arbitrators want to make it easy on themselves and are clearly abusing the system to their advantage.

  

We have seen the recall coup d’état in the PLAYA DEL MAR CASE, where arbitrator James Earl allowed a recall to succeed that was obviously conducted in bad faith. Reading Earl's ORDER FOLLOWING EMERGENCY HEARING makes you wonder if this arbitrator used any common sense. His ruling was an open invitation to abuse the system!

  

The recall of board member Rosa Ortega by community association managers in the LAKE LAURA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. in Miami was about as ridiculous as it gets. But instead of smelling foul play, arbitrator Bruce Campbell took 13 (thirteen) days to issue an ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED. The reason for the order: Annual elections upcoming in February! Considering that it took him 13 days to issue this ORDER -- that is nothing more than a template sitting ready in the computer,  just names and addresses have to be added --  I can nearly understand why he is so concerned about the time-restraint. It's amazing that this Order refers to a letter from the DIVISION that never reached the Petitioner (quote): "If Petitioner does show cause, Petitioner shall also comply with the requirements of the letter from Division staff dated December 24, 2007." Maybe Santa Claus disappeared with the letter?

    

I guess we'll never find out what this "letter" was all about, because the petitioner was sick and tired of the unresponsive behavior of the DIVISION employees and stopped payment on the check for the arbitration filing. Why should you pay somebody who is unwilling to do the work you've already paid him to do?

    

These kinds of cases happen all the time, caused by DIVISION employees unwilling to enforce the rules and statutes. 

   

As a petitioner stated in his MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND CLARIFICATION (quote): "It is highly unlikely that the legislators intended to create the recall provision to allow a group of people gaining power of the board of an association by making a mockery of the recall procedures created by the Florida legislature."


 WE MEAN IT: LET'S SUE THE DIVISION

BOARD DIRECTOR RECALLED BY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION MANAGERS

DBPR ARBITRATOR JAMES EARL -- PROCRASTINATOR PAR EXCELLENCE!


NEWS PAGE HOME DYSFUNCTIONAL DBPR