ACTION WITHOUT MEETING |
An
Opinion By Jan Bergemann Published July 5, 2011
I always have to admire the ingenuity of some board members and their attorneys in their attempts to circumvent the provisions of the Florida Statutes.
Anybody halfway familiar with FS 720 -- the Statutes regulating mandatory homeowners' associations -- knows that ALL board meetings have to be public. Two Exemptions 1.) Meetings between the board and its attorney with respect to proposed or pending litigation where the contents of the discussion would otherwise be governed by the attorney-client privilege. 2.) Meetings of the board held for the purpose of discussing personnel matters. These meetings can be held behind closed doors -- but that's it!
We have seen many attempts by board members to keep out these pesky homeowners -- you know the guys always asking in public the wrong question at the wrong time, like: "Where is the money from the reserve funds?" or "Why did you sign a contract at outrageous cost with the landscaping firm owned by our board president?" Just to name a few questions board members don't like to hear.
But I have to admit that this new attempt, named ACTION WITHOUT MEETING made by the board of the COLLEGE CHASE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. in Ruskin, is most likely the most blatant effort to shut out the owners from the daily business of the association.
Why bother to leave home, if a simple telephone call -- or just an e-mail -- allows board members to make the decision whenever needed? They don't even have to miss the latest "American Idol." They can sit on the sofa, munch on their potato chips -- with a cocktail in the other hand -- and "consent" to the proposal. And no more interference from these pesky homeowners who never know when to quit asking questions.
WHY DIDN'T ANYBODY COME UP WITH THIS BRILLIANT IDEA MUCH EARLIER?
|