HOW TO FLEECE HOMEOWNERS? |
An Opinion By Jan Bergemann
Published July 11, 2023 I can assure you: Some Management firms and some law firms have really made it an art creating some extra income – to the detriment of homeowners. I guess the Florida Legislature had thought that they had it all figured out when they enacted FS 720.3085 (see below). But some management firms and law firms are very inventive when it comes to fleecing homeowners. We all know the old trick: Cashing checks only a while after the past due date – and instead of immediately informing the homeowner that late fees are now due, they just wait some time before informing the owner – and now adding interest and “administrative late fees” to what little amount was owed initially. It’s good business if they wait long enough – and a $5 late fee quickly increases to a few hundred dollars. Here is an example from a ledger of a “past due” owner: Owner paid their assessments on 09/09/2021 but did not include the $3.00 in interest. Management sent them a demand letter at a cost of $35.95. By law this fee cannot be included in the demand letter but it gets put on the owner’s ledger. After that it just snowballed with monthly charges of $35.95 until the Owners ended up paying $774.77 in August of 2022, which was $400.00 in assessments and $374.77 in mostly management fees. The management company had, prior to the final payment, wrote off interest and late fees but not their management fees. Since the original $3.00 in interest was reversed there should not have been any management fees!
Or another example of circumventing the wording of the statutes: FirstService Residential (former Continental) is charging $35.95 per month in “admin fees” to send notices. It gets even better if the late-notice is being sent to an address – or e-mail address -- the owner is no longer using. Now it’s time for the management firm to hand the “delinquent” account over to a “friendly” law firm (rumor has it that some law firms are even paying a $150 “Finder’s Fee” to management firms) and a once small amount turns into a debt of a few thousand dollars. Big business since most owners don’t have the financial ability to fight this “SCAM” in court and rather scramble trying to find the money to pay off this “artificially created” debt in order to avoid the foreclosure of their home. And it looks like even judges don’t really know the provisions of FS 720.3085. Court records show that they even allowed “administrative fees” to be charged when it comes to allowing legal fees to the prevailing party. These money-making ways to increase the income comes pretty much without any risk; If the management company is caught red-handed, they use the old defense already used in the Nuremberg trial: “We acted on orders of the board!” well, it didn’t work in Nuremberg, but it sure works in Tallahassee!
|