THE ASSOCIATION MANUAL
| THE ASSOCIATION CORPORATION |
|
|
THE REALTY EXPERTS, INC. Tel:
561-471-9940, Fax: 561-471-2737 Email:
[email protected]
Both
of these regulated corporate styles are operated by boards of directors
for the benefit of shareholders. When one is a shareholder in either CH
607 or CH 617 one can sell one’s shares and become disassociated with
the corporation. In the common
interest realty association one is not a “shareholder” and is
permanently a “member” of the association until one is able to sell
the real property to which the membership is irrevocable tied.
Therefore, neither of the aforementioned corporate styles is
applicable to common interest realty not-for-profit association
corporations. INDIVIDUAL
OWNERS’ INVESTMENTS
People purchase in condominiums
and planned unit developments to enjoy the freedom from property
maintenance. They entrust
their largest investment and their personal funds to total strangers to
manage.
In order to create
meaningful change to the way in which associations are governed we must
begin with the entity which was formed to operate the association
concept. Given
the fact that there is only one reason for the existence of condominium
and planned unit association corporations, that reason must be clearly
stated and all regulatory legislation follows. For
example: a homeowner and
condominium corporate statute should contain definitions and the role of
the individual in the governing process. The mere proclamation that
“If the board of directors is not doing their job then kick the bums
out” is unrealistic. Changing
board members by holding expensive membership meetings for the purpose
does not occur in the majority of associations, for many reasons. While
both CH 718 and CH 720 can be amended each year, and forever, these
amendments do not address the foundation (CH 617) on which these
statutes is based and from which they originally sprouted. Recognize
that association membership does not bestow shares of stock in the
corporation upon unit/home owners.
While they have an equity interest in the association, it is not
redeemable and is therefore, for all intents and purposes, just a number
on the balance sheet. Enforcement
of the condominium and HOA acts needs to be revisited.
By creating a corporation act for association corporations only,
enforcement provisions may be revised. We must provide an agency,
separate and distinct from the DBPR which is clearly overburdened with
licensing, registration, regulation and enforcement of all
professions and businesses under their jurisdiction. Preferably,
Ombudspersons need to be established in various Counties.
The purpose is to hear unit owner complaints.
This office must not be manned by attorneys, but may be handled
by persons who have proven experience and expertise in addition to
passing an on-line exam. Funding for this office is by annual fees
collected from homeowner associations. Finally,
as it stands now those living in over 55 and over 62 communities are being
abused every day.
They do not understand their documents, they do not have copies of
the statutes and as the most vulnerable of our unit/home owners should
have the benefit of redress without the expense of hiring legal counsel. As
a statement of fact (not vilification), be advised that Mediation does not
work. Association attorneys, in the main, do not Mediate. They have no
interest in conflict resolution. Therefore, more cost effective methods must be initiated. Funding the Ombudspersons at the rate of $20.00 per unit per year would be a place to start.
Understanding that inexperienced
persons absolutely cannot operate a multi-million dollar corporation which
is responsible for the health, safety and welfare of hundreds of residents
and their property, the time has come for a serious over-haul of the
system. At present, due to lack of constraints, board members shift their
responsibilities to managers or the association legal counsel.
This does not promote the will to read, research and generally
learn corporate governance. While the DBPR made a limited
attempt in the past to provide board member education it failed because
(a) the DBPR is overwhelmed with other responsibilities and (2) there is
no sub-agency that can provide the necessary education cost effectively. The answer is twofold:
(1) Create an additional corporate act which includes the
requirements for board membership. (2)
Within that context, provide a program requiring a test/exam similar to
the Driver Licensing and Insurance reduction courses offered on-line. Education To expect that unit owners will
suddenly become corporate executives overnight is patently unrealistic.
Board members coming to the responsibility are usually well
meaning, reasonable persons. However,
given the first one or two board meetings and their personas change.
Remarkably, they become ego driven to control and the exercise of
their power. In many
associations, counsel advises the newly seated board that they have the
power and authority to do whatever they wish because they are insulated
from sanctions due to their “volunteer” status and application of the
“business judgment rule”. The
President is advised that he/she is the “CEO” and as such can make
unilateral decisions without benefit of board input. This is a fascinating
phenomenon to observe. In point of fact, the President
of a common interest realty association should not be considered a CEO
because this person rarely has the knowledge, training, experience or
education to automatically become a CEO of a multi-million dollar
corporation. The lack of education and
training results in fraud, kickbacks, executing poorly drafted contracts,
promulgating rules and regulations inconsistent with the governing
documents, hiring unlicensed persons to perform work on the common areas
which requires licensing and otherwise operating the association as their
own private, personal kingdom. The problems associated with
common interest communities are a direct result of lack of education,
training and established rules for board members.
We can continuously amend the governing statutes and provide for
Mediation, Arbitration and any number of other modes of redress, but until
we correct the board member education problem contemporaneously with
providing an additional not-for-profit corporate act, there will be no
perceptible change. Is the answer to eliminate
volunteer boards? Perhaps we
can consider “professional” board members.
These would be persons who qualify through experience, training and
education to manage corporations. Call
them CEO or COO if you will, but perhaps these paid persons will more
effectively operate our common interest communities.
At least if they do not perform, based on periodic
performance reviews by an Ad Hoc
Owners’ Committee established for the purpose, they can be fired. After all, the legislative
intent is to provide a corporation as the vehicle for managing common
interest communities. Therefore,
accepting the premise that no corporation managed by persons having no
management skills, no training, no education and no experience can
survive, perhaps it is time to re-think corporate management as it relates
to the common interest community. At a minimum, if managers are
properly educated and trained they can assist the board of directors in
corporate governance. Currently, basic educational
constructs for managers are missing and need to be revised. See Chapter 2 for management and
board educational requirements. 11111111111111
It
is impossible to properly care for thousands of units in a month.
Particularly in the over 55 and over 62 communities where the
owners do not understand the documents, the financial statements, and the
relevance to state law.
CH 468 v. CH
475
|
|
The
Community Association Manager (CAM) is licensed to perform
“property management” which is one of the services of real
estate licensees under CH 475. In
fact, most |
Property
Management requires a different set of rules, a different knowledge base
and is unrelated to “corporate management”.
This is why 468 needs to be re-written to acknowledge the
differences and require additional educational requirements and operating
limitations
1.
There should be two levels of licensure for those entering
the profession of corporate association management.
2. The first level: Educational requirements, both classroom and online, designed solely to teach corporate structure and business management. This level must include all aspects of corporate definitions, the role of board members and officers and the role of the business manager. Additional requirements include the definition of “contract” and what constitutes a legally enforceable contract, legal definitions and their application in the HOA concept; the RFP, preparation of specifications, the bidding process, how to govern the corporation and all aspects of corporate management. The person qualifying for this level must be employed by a Management company, under the direct supervision of a Level 2 licensee, for a period of two years prior to becoming eligible to take additional courses and the Level 2 exam.
|
|
Unless
and until persons are properly educated in all aspects of corporate
and real property management they cannot possibly assist board
members in their responsibilities. |
3.
The second level: Educational
requirements include the physical plant, building components, how to read
and understand Plat maps, how to read legal descriptions (including metes
and bounds), definitions (including Easements v..“walking path”), how
to research property lines, surveys, types of construction and how each is
repaired/maintained as originally built.
This level must also include all aspects of financial planning,
including but not limited to accounting terms (cash v. accrual, etc.), how
to prepare financial statements, operating statements, reserves schedules,
and their relationship to the annual budget. Preparing the annual budget
by both methods (historical data & potential future trends) to avoid
fee targeting. Successful
completion of this level’s exam qualifies the manager to be able to
manage a community as an employee of an association.
ADVISING THE BOARD AND OFFICERS
Assuming
that the board members and officers are elderly and/or inexperienced in
corporate governance, the licensee must be prepared to offer educational
programs designed to provide them with the tools to make decisions.
After all, it is the primary responsibility of the board of
directors to set policy. Explaining
the goal setting process which requires planning and setting policy is a
primary function of the corporate manager while being mindful of the
prohibitions against the Unlicensed Practice of Law (UPL) as set forth by
the Florida Supreme Court.
Board meetings are
often recommended by the
RESPONSIBILITIES
OF THE BOARD AND OFFICERS
Communication is the
foundation of a properly governed association.
Given the fact that many owners cannot, for physical or job
reasons, or other, attend board meetings they never know board decisions
affecting their interests. Therefore,
communication is vital. The
statute should require that all associations provide monthly communication
to the membership. Communication
may be in the form of closed circuit TV, a website or Newsletter.
The communication must contain all of the monthly activities of the
manager and the board and issues coming to the board for consideration in
the coming months.
Promulgating rules by
board members is a misunderstood activity.
As previously noted, many board members’ reasons for becoming a
member of the board include self-aggrandizement.
This results in personal agendas becoming “rules”.
We need to provide a process for amending existing rules and/or
promulgating a set of Rules and Regulations where none previously existed.
Any proposed “rule” or “regulation” must be supported by a
copy of the statute or portion of the governing documents permitting the
proposed rule or regulation. For
example, many governing documents specifically allow the board to
promulgate and enforce rules for the “use of the common areas” only.
No other rule making or amending authority is stated in the
governing documents. However,
all boards practice rule amendments regularly creating all manner of
unusual rules which can, currently, only be challenged through Mediation
and costly litigation. This
means that they are not challenged and remain a part of the governing
documents as properties
We need a specific
format for documents amendments, and the attesting certificate. A review
of some of the recorded amendments in
With respect to
accumulating the required number of “votes” to amend:
some boards and involved managers merely have the owner (or the
purported owner) execute a paper with a “For or Against” to be
checked. I believe that if
challenged this would not stand the test of actual votes; i.e., to record
“votes” an association must have a duly noticed meeting at which the
proposed amendment is to be discussed and voted upon by ballot.
Of course another method is by “joinder” wherein the unit
owners execute a voting affidavit which is notarized.
The acknowledgement ensures that the person voting is (a) The owner
of record (b) Is not the owner’s uncle Joe or aunt Mame.
Any other method of obtaining consents for amendments must be
deemed illegal.
Attempts to amend the
Declaration or By-Laws is a favorite activity of board members.
An example in an over 55 community in Palm Beach County:
the board wants to (1) Make
hoteliers out of unit owners by requiring that they can only rent their
units for six (6) months or less, one time in a 12 month period, and (2)
Require that all purchasers after the effective date may not obtain
mortgages for less than 80% of the purchase price.
These “amendments”
were written by either the property manager or a unit owner. The language
is insufficient, the structure is incorrect and the words “hyphened
through” are meaningless and not applicable to anything. The renting of
a condominium unit for a period of six (6) months or less is subject to
taxation at the rate of 6% of the amount of the rent collected (CH 212 F.S.).
Since the unit owners’ ages, generally, exceed 60 they do not
understand proposed amendments and the potential impact upon their heirs
at inheritance. I am of the opinion that a board does not have the
authority to regulate mortgages including, but not limited to the down
payment requirements which may not be consistent with the lender’s
determination of the credit worthiness of the purchaser. In point of fact,
anyone can have financial problems, resulting in default, subsequent to
obtaining a mortgage whether they put 20% down, less or more.
In
order to stop enforcement of illegally approved amendments unit owners
must file for an injunction, and subsequent judicial ruling, in Circuit
Court, which requires the hiring of an attorney and many months of waiting
during which time the terms of the amendment(s) could have unfortunate
affects upon the affected unit owners.
|
Enforcement
|
|
Before determining the
role of the DBPR in enforcement one must ask “why are the complaints
escalating?” One reason of
course is that more and more condominiums and planned unit developments
have come on line in the past five years.
Particularly in the past two years the conversions from
multi-family residential properties to condominiums has created a glut of
problems. Multi-family
apartment buildings, generally, are not always the best qualified for
conversions given the fact that their original construction did not
comport with more rigid condominium design.
Regardless of the
foregoing, continuing to put out the fires, legislatively, year after year
obviously is not solving the problems So, without changes to the foundation/structure
of the common interest realty association in
However, assuming that
the intent of the legislature is to reform the structure to provide for
proper educational requirements of board members, officers and managers
then reformed enforcement can occur as well.
Recognizing that it is
only the funds of the unit owners and homeowners that provide the funds to
operate the association corporation, it is important to conserve the costs
of litigation and legal fees for matters that can be best settled by other
means. In other words, too
much reliance on attorneys by boards results in excessive annual fees.
Remembering that the association corporation will cease to exist
were it not funded by the property/unit owners , it is prudent now to
restructure the association corporation with a view to acknowledging that
the association corporation is not an entity operated by professionals for
the benefit of shareholders.
With respect to covenants and/or statutory violations, all complaints should be directed to the Ombudsperson; finalized with binding Arbitration should the parties disagree with the findings of the Ombudsperson, as follows.:
(i)
A clear and complete statement of the violation and the parties
together with the
association name, address, and document number.
(ii)
Copies of the applicable portion of the statute or governing
documents must be attached in order to be considered.
(iii) The
Ombudsperson reviews the documents to determine whether a violation has
occurred and responds to the unit owner accordingly.
(iv) For
a finding of fault against the association the Ombudsperson is authorized
to provide his/her findings supported by statute or case law with a
recommendation that the association shall cure the problem.
(v)
In the event that the association shall refuse to accept the
determination, then in that event the association shall pay all of its
attorney fees and costs as well as the attorney fees and costs of the
Defendant incurred in Binding Arbitration.
(vi) Where
the association has a complaint against the unit owner the foregoing
procedures shall be followed.
(vii) If
the Ombudsperson determines that the unit owner is at fault in the matter
then in that event the unit owner shall have the option of complying with
the order of the Ombudsperson or proceeding to Binding Arbitration.
(viii) In
the event that the unit owner shall decide to proceed with Binding
Arbitration then in that event each party shall bear it own costs and fees
equally.
(ix) The
foregoing does not apply to any action brought by the association
against the unit owner involving any financial matter.
(x)
Mediation either pre-suit or with the DBPR is deleted.
It
is clear that the original concept of an entity to operate the common
interest community was established by attorneys.
As we continue to grow the statutes become more and more
convoluted. The average person
needs legal counsel just to understand the statute.
Governing the association, which consists of
the residences of the elderly as well as the younger person, is not
as difficult as it now has become due to the convoluted
statutes surrounding the concept.
In
addition to the requirements of the statutes the average homeowner has to
read and comprehend at least 96 pages of the contract they have with the
association: the “governing
documents”. Clearly, governing real property to ensure that it is
maintained, safe and secure to the best of the abilities of
the layperson should never have grown to unmanageable proportions.
The differences between the condominium and the planned unit development concepts are minor. The condominium can be in any shape and size. The common areas are owned by each unit owner in his proportionate share while in the planned unit development governed by the HOA, the common areas are owned by the association corporation. Basically, those differences are not worthy of pages and pages of legalese which, in the final analysis, serves no useful purpose other than providing a source of income for certain service providers.
|
Revising Current Law
|
|
Email (electronic) discussions and meeting preparation considerations between a quorum of the board constitutes a meeting and must be noticed. Notices of board meetings shall include the Agenda items for each meeting. All email communications between board members shall be part of the Official Records.
The Official Records shall be maintained in the County, or in the City, whichever is the taxing authority, in which the development is located.
All contracts for goods and services shall contain a thirty (30) day cancellation clause wherein the contract may be canceled by either party without cause.
All meetings of the board of directors shall be noticed with the date, time, place, purpose, and agenda and shall be posted in conspicuous places in the community at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. Conspicuous shall be defined as a place or places between, contiguous or proximate to a group of not more than eight (8) units in a buildings or a group of two (2) buildings having five (5) or more floors.
Meetings
of the board of directors where Special Assessments shall be
considered shall be noticed by U.S. Postal Service Regular mail not
less than fourteen (14) days prior to the meeting.
The notice shall contain the date, time and place of the
meeting and will disclose, with specificity, the following:
(i)
The purpose of the Special Assessment.
(ii)
A list of the bids submitted for the project stating the name
of the bidder, the
date and amounts of each bid and the selected bidder’s
information.
(iii)
The amount of the Assessment, the interest rate, the type of
interest (add on, amortized, rule of 78s, etc.), the term of
repayment, a clause that states that there is no penalty for
pre-payment in whole or in part, and a clause that states the default
interest rate.
(iv)
For Special Assessments to be levied for repairs (emergency or
otherwise) for which there have been no bids, the minimum anticipated
amount, based on verbal, projected estimated costs of like kind
materials and labor, shall be levied. In addition to the requirements
in (iii) herein, a statement may be included that after the work has
commenced and/or bids for the work have been received and it is clear
that a shortfall has or will occur, then in that event an
additional Special Assessment may be levied.
(v) Included in the assessment disclosure
shall be a statement that in the event that the anticipated costs at
the conclusion of the project shall be less than the amount of the
levy then in that event any overage shall be returned to the unit
owner of record on the day of refund.
The funds collected on account of Special Assessments shall not be co-mingled with any other funds of the association. Deposits to the Operating Fund Account(s) must be transferred to a separate account on, or before, the thirtieth (30) day of each month prior to the close of banking business.
The use of Special Assessment funds and Reserve funds for any purpose other than that for which the funds have been collected shall be fraud and subject to prosecution.
Procedures before filing a Lien for defaulted assessments:
(i)
The manager or a duly designated board member shall contact the
unit/home owner to discuss the member’s reason(s) for default, including
but not limited to obtaining a current Financial Statement for the
purposes of determining the repayment amount(s). The financial information
of any member shall be destroyed after either failure to perform under the
terms of the agreement, sale of the property, or completion of all
payments.
(ii)
A reasonably constructed “Repayment Agreement” shall be
reviewed by the full board and if approved shall be proffered to the
member. In the context of this Agreement the term “reasonable” shall
be defined as that which is clearly within the financial resources of the
member.
(iii) Repayment agreements shall
also include an amount which shall be posted to current, monthly
assessments. Recognizing that
it serves no useful purpose for an association to attempt to collect more
than is available (the blood from stone concept) repayment of past due
assessments and current assessments,
and special assessments, if applicable, shall be structured to total no
more than one-fourth (1/4) of the total monthly income from all sources of
the member.
(iv)
The board of directors shall make every effort to conserve
association funds by having the association’s counsel prepare a template
(form) for the board’s use in preparing Repayment Agreements prior to
incurring any legal collection fees.
All persons or companies that employ Community Association Managers shall be registered with the DBPR in the same way that Real Estate Brokerage firms are registered. Both the main office and any branch office at which the licensees work shall be registered together with the names, addresses, and license numbers of all licensees working at the company. Change of employing company shall be reported to the DBPR within ten (10) days by both the employing company and the licensee. The DBPR shall determine the fees pertaining to company registration.
Individual
Level 2 Licensees employed by associations shall at all times and
within ten (10) days of changing employers report the changes to the
DBPR on a form promulgated for that purpose.
Minutes
of all meetings of the board of directors, the membership, the annual
membership meetings and meetings of committee members shall be
published to the membership within twenty (20) days of the meeting.
Copies of the minutes may be made available, at no charge, to
the member in the association’s clubhouse, meeting room, or other
specifically designated area within the community.
Posting a complete copy on a community bulletin board is
acceptable provided that copies shall be made available, at no charge,
to the member on request. Minutes
of meetings where assessments were considered, discussed and approved
shall be included in the mailings. If the association has a closed
circuit TV or website, the minutes may be included in these venues.
The
association shall initiate and maintain a consistent form of
communication to the membership. The
method may be by closed circuit TV, a website or Newsletter.
The communication shall contain all information known to the
board at the time of dissemination.
Policy, procedures, goals, both long term and strategic, should
be the basis of the communication. Governing documents, including all
amendments and rules and regulations shall be a part of any website.
All
proposed amendments to the governing documents, including the Rules
and Regulations shall first be proposed to the membership at a duly
noticed meeting where a quorum has been attained.
The complete form of the amendment shall be prepared and
delivered to the membership together with a Limited Proxy which shall
either contain the complete text of the proposed amendment(s) or, if
the amendments are lengthy they may be attached in which case the
Limited Proxy shall clearly state that the amendment(s) is attached to
and a part of the Limited Proxy. Voting
on amendments to the governing documents and rules shall be by ballot
contained within a sealed envelope which shall be placed in a mailing
envelope for return to the association; or for the members’ use in
placing the sealed ballot envelope in a ballot box at the meeting.
Prior to preparing amendments to the governing documents or rules the board shall have researched the applicable statute(s) and, if required, case law and references to the supporting authority shall be made by the board in the Limited Proxy. Example: Pursuant to CH ____F.S,, Article XXX , and Article XX of the Declaration of (Condominium) or (Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions) the board of directors has determined that in the interest of preserving the _________certain changes should be authorized by the membership/
The
failure of an association to provide access to the official records
within ten (10) business days of the date of receipt of the written
request establishes a presumption that the association refuses to
comply with this sub-section. In
the
A
member who is denied access to the official records is entitled to
damages for the association’s failure to comply with this
sub-section. The minimum damages are $50.00 per calendar day, up to
ten (10) calendar days, the calculation to begin on the eleventh (11th)
business day after receipt of the written request.
In
the event that the member shall have been denied access to the
requested records and the member proceeds to pre-suit Mediation (or
Binding Arbitration) and the association shall subsequently agree to
provide the record(s) then in that event the association shall
reimburse the member for the member’s out of pocket expenses
incurred in the Mediation (or Binding Arbitration).
720.305
(4): If an association
fails to fill vacancies on the board of directors sufficient to
constitute a quorum in accordance with the by-laws, any member may
apply to the circuit court that has
having jurisdiction over the
community served by the association
the subject matter, for the appointment of a r
Receiver to manage the affairs
operate the association corporation.
At least 30 15 days
before applying to the Circuit Court,,,,,,,,,,,…giving the
association 30
15 days to fill the vacancies. All
filing fees, attorney fees and costs incurred by the member in this
cause shall be reimbursed to the member by the Receiver upon
appointment.
(1)
A unit owner or other eligible person desiring to be a candidate for
the board of administration shall give written notice to the
association not less than 40 days before a scheduled election. Written
notice shall be effective when received by the association. Written
notice shall be accomplished in accordance with one or more of the
following methods:
(a)
By certified mail, return receipt requested, directed to the
association; or
(b)
By personal delivery to the association; or
(c)
By regular
(2)
Upon receipt by the association of any timely submitted written notice
by personal delivery that a unit owner or other eligible person
desires to be a candidate for the board of administration, the
association shall issue a written receipt acknowledging delivery of
the written notice. Candidates who timely submit a written notice by
mail may wish to send the written notice by certified mail in order to
obtain a written receipt.
(3)
Upon the timely request of a candidate as set forth in this paragraph,
the association shall include, with the second notice of election
described in subsection (4), a copy of an information sheet which may
describe the candidate's background, education, and qualifications as
well as other factors deemed relevant by the
(5)
The written ballot shall indicate in alphabetical order by surname,
each and every unit owner or other eligible person who desires to be a
candidate for the board of administration and who gave written notice
to the association not less than 40 days before a scheduled election,
unless such person has, prior to the mailing of the ballot, withdrawn
his candidacy in writing. The failure of the written ballot to
(6)
Envelopes containing ballots received by the association shall be
retained and collected by the association and shall not be opened
except in the manner and at the time provided herein.
(b)
Any association desiring to verify outer envelope information in
advance of the meeting may do so as provided herein. An impartial
committee designated by the board may, at a meeting noticed in the
manner required for the noticing of board meetings, which shall be
open to all unit owners and which shall be held on the date of the
election, proceed as follows. For purposes of this rule,
“impartial” shall mean a committee whose members do not include
any of the following or their spouses:
1.
Current board members;
2.
Officers; and
3.
Candidates for the board.
At
the committee meeting, the signature and unit identification on the
outer envelope shall be checked against the list of qualified voters.
The voters shall be checked off on the list as having voted. Any
exterior envelope not signed by the eligible voter shall be marked
“Disregarded” or with words of similar import, and any ballots
contained therein shall not be counted.
(7)
Any voter who requires assistance to vote by reason of blindness,
disability, or inability to read or write, may request the assistance
of a member of the board of administration or other unit owner to
assist in casting his vote. If the election is by voting machine, any
such voter, before retiring to the voting booth, may have a member of
the board of administration or other unit owner or representative,
without suggestion or interference, identify the specific vacancy or
vacancies and the candidates for each. If a voter requests the aid of
any such individual, the two
(8)
At a minimum, all voting machines shall meet the following
requirements:
(a)
Shall secure to the voter secrecy in the act of voting;
(b)
Shall permit the voter to vote for as many persons and offices as he
is lawfully entitled to vote for, but no more;
(c)
Shall correctly register or record, and accurately count all votes
cast for any and all persons;
(d)
Shall be furnished with an electric light or proper substitute, which
will give sufficient light to enable voters to read the ballots; and
(e)
Shall be provided with a screen, hood, or curtain which shall be made
and adjusted so as to conceal the voter and his actions while voting.
(9)
Notices of election, notices of candidacy for election, information
sheets, voting envelopes, written approval of budgets, written
agreements for recall of board members, ballots, sign-in sheets,
voting proxies, and all other papers relating to voting by unit owners
shall be maintained as part of the official records of the association
for a period of 1 year from the date of the election, vote, or meeting
to which the document relates.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
CURRENT LAW DOES NOT PROVIDE FOR THE PROTECTION OF REAL PROPERTY AND CONTRACT RIGHTS.
all
common interest realty associations exist under “contracts” which
define the association’s agreements to perform certain maintenance
responsibilities and provide certain services in consideration of the
payment of sums of non-refundable money.
Contract
breaches by the board of directors occur daily.
Owners have no cost effective access to resolution.
Members
of a board of directors must receive corporate/business management
education.
persons
becoming corporate managers who are responsible for the day to day
operations of a community must be properly educated and licensed.
dispute
resolution must be changed to a set pattern:
ombudsperson, binding arbitration.
mediation must be deleted due to the high costs involved with no
resolution, resulting in litigation or loss of rights.
promulgated
forms for documents amendments should be statutory.
meeting
notices, information and posting are insufficient.
minutes must be provided, at no cost, to unit owners, or published
as stated in page 13.
rational
dialogue between a committee or board with an owner approaching default
status, prior to lien filing, should be statutory.
registration
of community association management companies should be mandatory and
include all licensees under the company.
all
decisions of a board of directors should be supported by the applicable
portion of the governing documents, state law or case law.
access
to the official records, when denied for non-existence must be supported
by the association’s reasons.
access
to the official records, when denied after the statutory time period
presumes willful refusal (is non rebuttable).
it
is understood that all funds of an association were generated by the
owners of real property and that all records generated by persons in
positions of authority (board members) and managers are the undisputed
property of the unit/home owners. the
inalienable right to accounting for the funds and receipt of all records
must be clearly stated in law.
the
inclusion of clauses in by-laws which prohibit non-resident owners from
voting at members’ meetings unless they physically appear to cast their
vote(s) is unconstitutional and must be corrected in the statute.
a
table of fines for non-compliance with the governing documents and/or
state law should be promulgated. collection
of the fines shall be through County court in the applicable jurisdiction.
ALL
OWNERS IN MANDATORY COMMON INTEREST REALTY COMMUNITIES ARE SIMILARLY
SITUATED AND MUST THEREFORE RECEIVE COMMON CONSIDERATION AND COST
EFFECTIVE REDRESS UNDER THE LAW.
